Re: default umask settings

2002-04-10 Thread Nick Rout
> HOWEVER think carefully about running or even testing commands as root. > It's just a Bad Idea. If you've been on this list for a while you will know that Barry runs _everything_ as root LOL. He also organises great suppers ;-) -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: default umask settings

2002-04-10 Thread Barry
Thank you for the replies, umask shows 077 so this is not the problem. I am now checking with the author of the app Barry --- Barry wrote: > > I am having a problem with temporary files required by a new app I am > trying. > > Where/how do I set default permissions for root, user please. >

RE: default umask settings

2002-04-10 Thread Falconer, Craig
umask would be the command you want. HOWEVER think carefully about running or even testing commands as root. It's just a Bad Idea. > -- > From: Barry[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 16:28 > To: 'clug' > Subjec

Re: default umask settings

2002-04-10 Thread Jim Cheetham
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:28:44AM -0400, Barry wrote: > I am having a problem with temporary files required by a new app I am > trying. > > Where/how do I set default permissions for root, user please. You need to look at the umask setting. The default setting lives within the kernel, but you

default umask settings

2002-04-10 Thread Barry
I am having a problem with temporary files required by a new app I am trying. Where/how do I set default permissions for root, user please. Barry.