Sig files and appropriateness was RE: OT? Re: HD advice.

2005-08-25 Thread Craig FALCONER
] University of Canterbury +64 3 3642987 ext 7762 New Zealand Whats inappropriate about that Steve? You refer to Windows and MacOS in your sig - is that appropriate? -Original Message- From: Steve Holdoway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 August 2005 9

Re: Sig files and appropriateness was RE: OT? Re: HD advice.

2005-08-25 Thread Nick Rout
I think all sig files over a couple of lines are evil, especially in mailing lists. People forget to snip and you end up with more accumulated sigs than signal. Lets try and lower the noise. On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:51:37 +1200 Craig FALCONER wrote: [SNIP!!!} -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sig files and appropriateness was RE: OT? Re: HD advice.

2005-08-25 Thread Christopher Sawtell
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:12, Nick Rout wrote: I think all sig files over a couple of lines are evil, s/lines/characters/ -- CS

Re: Sig files and appropriateness was RE: OT? Re: HD advice.

2005-08-25 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Fri 26 Aug 2005 10:12:15 NZST +1200, Nick Rout wrote: I think all sig files over a couple of lines are evil, especially in mailing lists. People forget to snip and you end up with more accumulated sigs than signal. Oh really Nick? You haven't been trimming your replies in donkeys years

Re: Sig files and appropriateness was RE: OT? Re: HD advice.

2005-08-25 Thread Nick Rout
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:18:11 +1200 Volker Kuhlmann wrote: Oh really Nick? You haven't been trimming your replies in donkeys years... ;)) Volker I try, sometimes I forget. -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP sig (Was: How to mount a scsi tape drive?)

2003-03-31 Thread Yuri de Groot
It's like a checksum. If you have the sender's public PGP key stored on your machine, you can use the PGP sig to verify that it came from the sender. Only the sender can produce the sig, using his/her private key. Recipients can then use their own copy of the sender's public key to verify

Re: PGP sig (Was: How to mount a scsi tape drive?)

2003-03-31 Thread Mike Beattie
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:57:20PM +1200, Yuri de Groot wrote: Only the sender can produce the sig, using his/her private key. Recipients can then use their own copy of the sender's public key to verify. Best way to think of it, is like this: Signature - Plain Text Encrypted Text

.sig

2002-12-04 Thread Nick Rout
just had toshow off my new signature, although i cannot claim originality :-) -- All that was needed was to parse the cat root slash dev etcetera file for eth0 and pugle the forward identity-locking rehooliginator and symlink it to the libgc perl humongisooler module after a kernel decompile and

Re: .sig

2002-12-04 Thread Carl Cerecke
Nick Rout wrote: All that was needed was to parse the cat root slash dev etcetera file for eth0 and pugle the forward identity-locking rehooliginator and symlink it to the libgc perl humongisooler module after a kernel decompile and basic repatch update. - theregister.co.uk I think I did that