insesant wisecraks? what the hack is that? doens't seem to be english.
oh.. I never knew the Love is with UL now was a rumour. sorry about that.
Isn't UL more related to electricity? it's on the back my power supply,
and my monitor. :)
Do you understand that Ransom Love IS NOT A PART OF
a piece of cake for me if I use clipper/foxpro and even C.
# chkhit /var/log/messages
port,hits
25,10
139,1
6112,20
#
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
Send me some of that shit you're smoking.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:36:27 +0800
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
insesant wisecraks? what the hack is that? doens't seem to be
english. oh.. I never knew the Love is with UL now was a rumour.
sorry about that.
Isn't UL more related to
always that little gotcha somewhere.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:37:58 +0200
Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked. I have seen this. It is quite nice. The proviso on my question
was that it had to hold a full length PCI card.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 05:22:13 -0500
ronnie gauthier [EMAIL
out of boredom, I did these, over the openssh connection:
cd /proc
cd devices
cat *
... connection to server lost
after a few minutes, I telnet back to my server at port 23. got this:
ISS Telnet Configuration
Please enter password:
I am still in the office, so didn't know what really
ok, this stuff should do it:
Virtual Keyboard:
http://www.canesta.com/videos/keyboard.asf
http://www.canesta.com/chipset.htm
ronnie gauthier wrote:
Send me some of that shit you're smoking.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:10:11 -0500
ronnie gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
always that little gotcha somewhere.
More than little. It is a real problem. We use a DSP card that is this size.
And this size is getting very unpopular. Fewer and fewer boxes support it.
The ones that do seem to go
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:27:55 +0800
begin m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
anyone got an *existing* script that could list
the ports being blocked by iptables in /var/log/messages
plus the number of hits. like this:
# chkhit /var/log/messages
port,hits
25,10
139,1
6112,20
#
Well, if you must know, I've considered GenToo, but I want something
that I can get up and running fairly quickly, as I've other users to be
concerned about. Once I have RedHat 7.3 running, I'll have another spare
partition to experiment with. But I think I'll take a whack at LFS and
BLFS
Doug Hunley has just updated http://www.linux-sxs.org/razor.html to incorporate the
following:
Updated for configuration of new version 2
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
it really crashed the system. pondering why...
cd /proc
cd devices
cat *
connection to server lost
--
.~.Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. In Linux we trust.
/ v \ news://news.hkpcug.org
/( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
^ ^2.4.19 7:45pm up 14 min, 0 users, load
I just need example to get started. my perl is really weak despite of my
agiility in foxpro and c.
Sep 20 19:51:44 server kernel: iptables IN=ppp0 OUT= MAC=
SRC=64.4.13.202 DST=218.102.112.235 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=119
ID=17967 PROTO=TCP SPT=1863 DPT=3018 WINDOW=16821 RES=0x00 ACK FIN
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:54:46 -0400 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, if you must know, I've considered GenToo, but I want something
that I can get up and running fairly quickly, as I've other users to
be concerned about. Once I have RedHat 7.3 running, I'll have
another spare
That is if you do a fresh 8.0 install. I upgraded this boxen from
SuSe 7.3 to 8.0 and it kept all the
SuSEconfig stuff, as well as the dependancies on it. I have stumbled
across on 8.0, that you can
turn of all SuSEconfig checking as well as it checkperms stuff. But
it then tells you you will
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:39, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 9/20/2002 2:34 AM, someone claiming to be Collins wrote:
snipped
Gentoo always installs using a chrooted environment as does LFS, but
why on earth would you want to use one or the other to install the
other one?
If you want LFS or
Did anybody else get two copies of this e-mail?
On 9/20/2002 8:49 AM, someone claiming to be Ben Duncan wrote:
That is if you do a fresh 8.0 install. I upgraded this boxen from SuSe
7.3 to 8.0 and it kept all the
SuSEconfig stuff, as well as the dependancies on it. I have stumbled
across
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:55:26AM -0400, Tim Wunder wrote:
Did anybody else get two copies of this e-mail?
[snippage]
Yes.
Kurt
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:00:01PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
it really crashed the system. pondering why...
cd /proc
cd devices
cat *
connection to server lost
Hmm. On my systems, /proc/devices is a file, not a directory.
K
___
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:55, Tim Wunder wrote:
Did anybody else get two copies of this e-mail?
yes
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Friday 20 September 2002 07:21 am,dep wrote:
the other shoe has dropped:
Advanced Micro Devices will include Microsoft's Palladium trusted
-- meaning Microsoft- approved software only -- support in its next
generation of chips, according to published reports.
So... maybe the opportunity VIA needs? Besides furnishing chips for the
$200.00 Lindows system Walmart sells
At 10:21 AM 9/20/02 -0400, dep wrote:
the other shoe has dropped:
Advanced Micro Devices will include Microsoft's Palladium trusted
-- meaning Microsoft- approved software only --
I sent it and got back 2 as well hmmm If this gives 2, maybe my
ISP got problems
OR Maybe bouncing from the EDI list ?
Ben Duncan wrote:
That is if you do a fresh 8.0 install. I upgraded this boxen from SuSe
7.3 to 8.0 and it kept all the
SuSEconfig stuff, as well as the
On Thursday 19 September 2002 22:54, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
argh! screenshots man! screenshots! I'm not gonna reboot just to see what
they are!
of course, I could just unzip them and load them in an image viewer, but
where's the fun in that?
I really would have liked to supply screenshots,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
Well, if you must know, I've considered GenToo, but I want something
that I can get up and running fairly quickly, as I've other users to be
concerned about. Once I have RedHat 7.3 running, I'll have another spare
partition to experiment with. But I
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Friday 20 September 2002 07:21 am,dep wrote:
the other shoe has dropped:
Advanced Micro Devices will include Microsoft's Palladium trusted
-- meaning Microsoft- approved software only -- support in its next
generation of chips, according to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Duncan spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
I sent it and got back 2 as well hmmm If this gives 2, maybe my
ISP got problems
OR Maybe bouncing from the EDI list ?
the edi list has *nothing* to do with this list. that's
Ah, the famous sniff of fools, sails again.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:12:33 +0800
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no way, mon ami. besidse, sniff, not smoke. will inhale better.
ronnie gauthier wrote:
Send me some of that shit you're smoking.
insesant wisecraks? what the hack is that?
On Friday 20 September 2002 3:21 pm, dep wrote:
the other shoe has dropped:
Advanced Micro Devices will include Microsoft's Palladium trusted
-- meaning Microsoft- approved software only -- support in its next
generation of chips, according to published reports.
On Friday 20 September 2002 10:44 am,Pam R wrote:
snip
Palladium is an opt-in system.
Palladium is entirely an opt-in solution; systems will ship with
the Palladium hardware and software features turned off. The user
of the system can choose to simply stay with this default setting,
Pam,
I don't quite understand what the fuss is all about, to quote
from MS's
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2002/jul02/0724pal
ladiumwp.asp
SNIP
Palladium is an opt-in system.
SNIP
Turning Palladium completely off includes turning it off in
hardware, which
Who was it who remarked to the effect that 'a merchant would sell the
rope to be used at his own hanging'?
R
--
http://www.quen.net
Fix reason firmly in her seat and call to her tribunal every fact,
every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God;
because, if there is one,
Lenin.
Joel
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 05:32:56PM -0500, R. Quenett wrote:
Who was it who remarked to the effect that 'a merchant would sell the
rope to be used at his own hanging'?
R
--
http://www.quen.net
Fix reason firmly in her seat and call to her tribunal every fact,
every
If the Hollings's bill ever gets passed it would be a federal offense to
run thwe chip with Palladium switched off.
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Friday 20 September 2002 10:44 am,Pam R wrote:
snip
Palladium is an opt-in system.
Palladium is entirely an opt-in solution; systems will
from Joel Hammer:
Lenin.
Fitting. Thanks.
R
--
http://www.quen.net
Fix reason firmly in her seat and call to her tribunal every fact,
every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God;
because, if there is one, he must more approve of the homage of
reason, than that of
R. Quenett wrote:
Who was it who remarked to the effect that 'a merchant would sell the
rope to be used at his own hanging'?
R
--
http://www.quen.net\
That was Lenin, when we hang the last capitalist he will supply the
rope.
Lee
Fix reason firmly in her seat and call to her
Dear Group:
I have a few questions I am trying to resolve, in my use of linux.
First, for those curious, I am running Caldera Open Linux Workstation 3.1,
on a Pentium II machine, with 296mb ram.
Here are my problems:
When rebooting, I end up with a system frozen with the following as the
It may be optional now but as soon as they can MS will make it
non-optional. That's what they've done for everything so far - once they
got the software market sewed up they hiked prices and but the screws to
everyone. If you look at what it is it's typical MS - a nonsolution to a
problem
Bonez wrote:
Dear Group:
I have a few questions I am trying to resolve, in my use of linux.
First, for those curious, I am running Caldera Open Linux Workstation 3.1,
on a Pentium II machine, with 296mb ram.
Here are my problems:
When rebooting, I end up with a system frozen
Ken:
I tried that...and it produced the same situation.
Someone told me that it might be that i need to add something like 'apm=off'
to my lilo boot sequence..
I am not sure though.
Scott
On Friday 20 September 2002 18:26, you wrote:
Bonez wrote:
Dear Group:
I have a few
from Lee:
That was Lenin, when we hang the last capitalist he will supply the
rope.
Thankyou. That was the thought that popped into my mind when reading the AMD will
support Palladium story, but I couldn't remember the source.
R
--
http://www.quen.net
Fix reason firmly in her seat and
On Friday 20 September 2002 07:54 am, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:39, Tim Wunder wrote:
snip
OK. From what I've read on GenToo, I need to boot into it to install. If
I can install GenToo in a spare partition while keeping my *real* system
running, I'm interested. Please
Tim Wunder wrote:
On Friday 20 September 2002 07:54 am, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:39, Tim Wunder wrote:
snip
OK. From what I've read on GenToo, I need to boot into it to install. If
I can install GenToo in a spare partition while keeping my *real* system
running, I'm
On Friday 20 September 2002 09:18 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
On Friday 20 September 2002 07:54 am, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:39, Tim Wunder wrote:
snip
OK. From what I've read on GenToo, I need to boot into it to install. If
I can install GenToo in a
Tim Wunder wrote:
On Friday 20 September 2002 09:18 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
On Friday 20 September 2002 07:54 am, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:39, Tim Wunder wrote:
snip
OK. From what I've read on GenToo, I need to boot into it to install. If
I can install
anyway, I would not cat the /proc/devices/00/* again... :)
Iit possibly generated some garbbles that crashed the openssh daemon...
Kurt Wall wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:00:01PM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
it really crashed the system. pondering why...
cd /proc
cd devices
cat *
further to my questino on an analysis tool for iptables log.
is there a unix textutils or alike that would count the number of unique
symbols in a text file and produce a frequency distribition of them? It
should be a common feature in most compilers. I could write one, but
just wonder
bon voyage...
ronnie gauthier wrote:
Ah, the famous sniff of fools, sails again.
no way, mon ami. besidse, sniff, not smoke. will inhale better.
--
.~.Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. In Linux we trust.
/ v \ news://news.hkpcug.org
/( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
^ ^2.4.19
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:09:40 +0800
begin m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
further to my questino on an analysis tool for iptables log.
is there a unix textutils or alike that would count the number of unique
symbols in a text file and produce a frequency distribition of them? It
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:04:49 +0800
begin m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
I just need example to get started. my perl is really weak despite of my
agiility in foxpro and c.
Sep 20 19:51:44 server kernel: iptables IN=ppp0 OUT= MAC=
SRC=64.4.13.202 DST=218.102.112.235 LEN=40
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Ok, I have reinstated mention of this on my tweaks page. Hopefully this
might assist in stopping many people from building systems with broken
glibc's.
To reiterate the problem:-
* if your Ch 5 gcc build says checking assembler hidden
On 9/10/02 6:41, Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 01:20 pm, Tim Wunder espoused with vigour:
Well, she's just starting the class, so I don't have any examples. As a
test, I plan on going to
http://www2.warnerbros.com/web/movies/index.jsp?frompage=nav
to
51 matches
Mail list logo
