Hi
I've just noticed that the 'Playing Quicktime movies natively in linux' link
in New and the 'Quicktime' link in Video point to a text file not an html
one, although the text seems to be html.
--
Pam R: Yet another cute tag line
Linux StepbyStep: http://www.linux-sxs.org/stepbystep.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 23:23:14 -0500
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
[snip]
I liked and used Sylpheed for quite some time here and had no trouble
with it. It read HTML-sotted email, displayed images, and so forth
without incident. I gave up
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:24:36PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:11:15PM -, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?The Portal?= wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
PPCM.COM- US$ 560
Hmm. This one slipped through the filter. That said, who in
Eeeek. OK, i think its fixed now. Not sure what happened there. Sorry.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Pam R wrote:
Hi
I've just noticed that the 'Playing Quicktime movies natively in linux' link
in New and the 'Quicktime' link in Video point to a text file not an html
one, although the text seems
I may be getting a network storage device, namely a rather large hard drive
setup, that I believe connects into a lan via Ethernet. What I haven't a clue
is what protocol is used to access it.
Would anyone have hands on experience with one of these? I suspect it has it's
own on board
Most of these devices have a web interface to configure the box. Others
will allow you to connect a monitor and keyboard. Once the initial setup
is done, you can use all your normal admin tools.
Wil
-Original Message-
From: Jerry McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
The brand model might help us to help you. Is this a SAN box? Or
iSCSI?
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Wil McGilvery wrote:
Most of these devices have a web interface to configure the box. Others
will allow you to connect a monitor and keyboard. Once the initial setup
is done, you can use all your
Jerry McBride wrote:
Hi Wil,
Once configured, how do the clients access it? What I picture in my old grey
mind is a network file system, something along the lines of samba, nfs, etc...
it probably nfs or samba or both..
is it like a snap drive? or what brand is it?
--jim
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:13:52 -0500 (EST) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The brand model might help us to help you. Is this a SAN box? Or
iSCSI?
Sorry, Lonni... I won't know very much about it till I actually get it.
--
I'm thinking mozilla 1.2.1 is the best browser I've ever used, but how
can I disable popups? I've scanned all the preference options a dozen
times, and I just don't see it.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
Gentoo 1.4 sytem
___
Linux-users mailing list
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:59:18PM +, Collins wrote:
I'm thinking mozilla 1.2.1 is the best browser I've ever used, but how
can I disable popups? I've scanned all the preference options a dozen
times, and I just don't see it.
Edit - Preferences - Advanced - Scripts Plugins
Disable
Go to:
edit
preferences
advanced/scripts plugins
Uncheck Open unrequested windows box
Regards
Mike F
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:59, Collins wrote:
I'm thinking mozilla 1.2.1 is the best browser I've ever used, but how
can I disable popups? I've scanned all the preference options a dozen
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:10:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:59:18PM +, Collins wrote:
I'm thinking mozilla 1.2.1 is the best browser I've ever used, but
how can I disable popups? I've scanned all the preference options
a dozen times, and I just don't see it.
..because it fixes the problem with Flast crashing remote displays.
From the release notes:
Linux users should upgrade to the latest Flash 6 Beta. This new version
fixes several problems including crashing with remote displays and hangs
when the audio device is in use at the time Flash starts
On 12/10/02 17:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..because it fixes the problem with Flast crashing remote displays.
From the release notes:
Linux users should upgrade to the latest Flash 6 Beta. This new version
fixes several problems including crashing with remote displays and hangs
when the
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 12/10/02 17:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% ..because it fixes the problem with Flast crashing remote displays.
% From the release notes:
%
% Linux users should upgrade to the latest Flash 6 Beta. This new version
% fixes several problems including
Feigning erudition, David A. Bandel wrote:
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 23:23:14 -0500
% begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
%
% [snip]
%
% I liked and used Sylpheed for quite some time here and had no trouble
% with it. It read HTML-sotted
Thanks. I will install this as soon as possible. That has been a major
problem, since I have got both my women (wife and grown daughter) using
linux on remote X displays.
You want to know how I did it? Well, I told them we didn't have
any more working windows computers, which is true as far as
Feigning erudition, Joel Hammer wrote:
% Thanks. I will install this as soon as possible. That has been a major
% problem, since I have got both my women (wife and grown daughter) using
% linux on remote X displays.
Well, see my follow-up message, which said, in effect, I couldn't seem
to get it
On 12/10/02 17:57, Joel Hammer wrote:
Thanks. I will install this as soon as possible. That has been a major
problem, since I have got both my women (wife and grown daughter) using
linux on remote X displays.
You want to know how I did it? Well, I told them we didn't have
any more working
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 12/10/02 17:57, Joel Hammer wrote:
% Thanks. I will install this as soon as possible. That has been a major
% problem, since I have got both my women (wife and grown daughter) using
% linux on remote X displays.
%
% You want to know how I did it? Well,
I tried to install flash6.0,but it complained my glibc library is older than
2.2, which I didn't think it was.
So, help is needed.
How can I find out what my version of glibc is?
And, is upgrading glibc dangerous?
Joel
Feigning erudition, Joel Hammer wrote:
% Thanks. I will install this as
On 12/10/02 18:46, Joel Hammer wrote:
I tried to install flash6.0,but it complained my glibc library is older than
2.2, which I didn't think it was.
So, help is needed.
How can I find out what my version of glibc is?
ls -l /lib/libc.so.6
And, is upgrading glibc dangerous?
If done
Ok, I found David Bandel's StepbyStep for upgrading glibc. Is this still
current?
The current glibc is 2.3. Is that safe to put onto a caldera 2.4 box?
David's StepByStep didn't say what do do if you trashed your system. I can
dual boot into another distro of linux if necessary, so I don't have
Feigning erudition, Joel Hammer wrote:
%
%
% I tried to install flash6.0,but it complained my glibc library is older than
% 2.2, which I didn't think it was.
% So, help is needed.
% How can I find out what my version of glibc is?
$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.2.5, by
On 12/10/02 18:58, Joel Hammer wrote:
Ok, I found David Bandel's StepbyStep for upgrading glibc. Is this still
current?
Yup. I used it last month.
The current glibc is 2.3. Is that safe to put onto a caldera 2.4 box?
The most recent stable release i think is 2.2.5. 2.3 i think is still a
Yes, I know the program is usually slow, but what about when it is unusually
slow?
I've got OpenOffice 1.0.1 compiled as of yesterday morning on my Gentoo 1.4rc*
system with Portage 2.0.45, GCC 3.2.1, Glibc 2.3.1, and Blackdown JDK
1.4.1beta, kernel 2.5.51, and it was compiled under 2.5.50bk5.
Thanks.
I shall attempt this in the next few days.
Joel
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:26:24PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
On 12/10/02 18:58, Joel Hammer wrote:
Ok, I found David Bandel's StepbyStep for upgrading glibc. Is this still
current?
Yup. I used it last month.
The current glibc is
On 12/10/02 19:41, Bob Raymond wrote:
Yes, I know the program is usually slow, but what about when it is unusually
slow?
I've got OpenOffice 1.0.1 compiled as of yesterday morning on my Gentoo 1.4rc*
system with Portage 2.0.45, GCC 3.2.1, Glibc 2.3.1, and Blackdown JDK
1.4.1beta, kernel
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 03:44 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 12/10/02 19:41, Bob Raymond wrote:
Yes, I know the program is usually slow, but what about when it is
unusually slow?
I've got OpenOffice 1.0.1 compiled as of yesterday morning on my Gentoo
1.4rc* system with Portage 2.0.45,
The Subject: line pretty much says it, but allow me to phrase it as
a question: which is preferable, using a font server or using the
standard hard-coded FontPath directives in XF86Config? I don't serve
X terminals, so I'm not sure using a font server (xfs or, for True
Type fonts, xfstt) buys me
On 12/10/02 19:56, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 03:44 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 12/10/02 19:41, Bob Raymond wrote:
Yes, I know the program is usually slow, but what about when it is
unusually slow?
I've got OpenOffice 1.0.1 compiled as of yesterday morning on my Gentoo
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:57:44 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Collins wrote:
I'm thinking mozilla 1.2.1 is the best browser I've ever used,
That much better? Guess I'd better try it, but
what about galeon and 1.2.1. Does it work?
Haven't a clue. I'm on my smaller is better
Collins wrote:
I'm on my smaller is better kick,
Had a look at Beonex-comm, a netscape look a like that is mozilla based?
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 04:29:39 + Bob Raymond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 04:10 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 12/10/02 19:56, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 03:44 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 12/10/02 19:41, Bob Raymond wrote:
Yes, I know the
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:32:26 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Collins wrote:
I'm on my smaller is better kick,
Had a look at Beonex-comm, a netscape look a like that is mozilla
based?
Briefly on my RH 7.3 system, but I've been so impressed with the new
mozilla that I haven't
in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with
symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it mean an extra step to clear
all symlinks before buidling glibc?
my last trial (on a fresh-install COL 3.1) was a failure.I could't
compile a thing after the upgrade procedure.
Net
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make that I didn't need Sylpheed's GUI as badly as I thought I did.
% What I principally use the GUI for is to run multiple xterms. Makes
% cuting and pasting between windows (usually different systems) a breeze.
No argument here. I like X, I
38 matches
Mail list logo
