Earlier I wrote that by entering :
Section "DRI"
Mode 0666
EndSection
caused various problems, well, that was due to a typo in my config Having corrected this (0 instead of O) everything is solid here.
My apologies .
--
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Westbank, B. C.
Powered by Slackware 8.1, sent wi
Net Llama! wrote:
Everything up to this entry works great here, As soon as I make this
entry my system does all kinds of weird output to the monitor, even
fails to load X at times. Removeing this entry corrects that
behavior. As usual YMMV
which kernel & X version?
Sorry about that, X-4.3 k
Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, David Aikema wrote:
% On March 9, 2003 09:56 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
%
% > > And it gives me: 11058 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2211.400 FPS
% >
% > wow.
%
% glxgears -time
% 29279 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5855.800 FPS
% 34954 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6990.800 FPS
%
On 03/10/03 19:10, Ted Ozolins wrote:
Kurt Wall wrote:
% % > - A DRI section in your config file:
% >
% > Section "DRI"
% > Mode 0666
% > EndSection
Everything up to this entry works great here, As soon as I make this
entry my system does all kinds of weird output to the monitor, ev
On 03/10/03 18:38, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, David Aikema wrote:
% On March 9, 2003 09:56 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
%
% > > And it gives me: 11058 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2211.400 FPS
% >
% > wow.
%
% glxgears -time
% 29279 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5855.800 FPS
% 34954 frames in 5.0 seconds
Kurt Wall wrote:
%
% > - A DRI section in your config file:
% >
% > Section "DRI"
% > Mode 0666
% > EndSection
Everything up to this entry works great here, As soon as I make this
entry my system does all kinds of weird output to the monitor, even
fails to load X at times. Removei
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 03/10/03 17:24, Kurt Wall wrote:
% >
% >Er, no.
%
% what ya got against sf.net?
Nuttin'.
Kurt
--
"I'd love to go out with you, but I'm doing door-to-door collecting for
static cling."
___
Linux-users mailing
Feigning erudition, David Aikema wrote:
% On March 9, 2003 09:56 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
%
% > > And it gives me: 11058 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2211.400 FPS
% >
% > wow.
%
% glxgears -time
% 29279 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5855.800 FPS
% 34954 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6990.800 FPS
%
% (GeForce 4 TI42
On March 9, 2003 09:56 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
> > And it gives me: 11058 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2211.400 FPS
>
> wow.
glxgears -time
29279 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5855.800 FPS
34954 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6990.800 FPS
(GeForce 4 TI4200)
David Aikema
On 03/10/03 17:24, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
% > Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% > % Good evening,
% > % Has anyone played with DRI at all? I'd really like a SxS on it, as i'd
% > % like to set it up with out trashing my X
On 03/10/03 17:27, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% well, i got to the point where i saw:
% direct rendering: Yes
%
% however, if i try & run glxgears, my entire X session goes to hell, with
% the output getting literally smeared horizontally across the screen. this
% wa
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% well, i got to the point where i saw:
% direct rendering: Yes
%
% however, if i try & run glxgears, my entire X session goes to hell, with
% the output getting literally smeared horizontally across the screen. this
% was with 32MB of memory specified in XF8
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
% > Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% > % Good evening,
% > % Has anyone played with DRI at all? I'd really like a SxS on it, as i'd
% > % like to set it up with out trashing my X configuration.
% >
% > Not much to
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:30:39 + "Robert E. Raymond"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious as to what options you have in your XF86Config, and whether SSE
> really makes that much of a difference:
>
It's not real fancy, but here's a clip from my XF86Config file:
Section "Module"
Load
well, i got to the point where i saw:
direct rendering: Yes
however, if i try & run glxgears, my entire X session goes to hell, with
the output getting literally smeared horizontally across the screen. this
was with 32MB of memory specified in XF86Config. when i reduced it to
4096, X fails to st
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
> % Good evening,
> % Has anyone played with DRI at all? I'd really like a SxS on it, as i'd
> % like to set it up with out trashing my X configuration.
>
> Not much to play with, frankly. You need
>
> - Kernel support fo
Kurt Wall wrote:
Make sure the agpgart.o module is getting loaded.
Option AGPMode "2"
See also:
Option "AGPFastWrite "Yes"
These are valid for the radeon driver, so they might work for the
r128.
Kurt
___
Yes, found the AGPMode reference in a prior p
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:39:45AM -0800, Ted Ozolins wrote:
> Jerry McBride wrote:
>
> Finally, I've got DRI running on Slack-8.1 but not as I would like to
> see it. I couldn't get the dri extension up on X-4.2 so I finally did
> the up-grade to 4.3. glxinfo relects the fact that dri is up bu
rtfm'd every doc I can find, yet have seen no reference to AGP settings.
Did I miss something?
Dang! if I'd read all the mail I'd had seen Roberts XF86Config section
on vidio. Thanks...:)
--
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Westbank, B. C.
Powered by Slackware 8.1, sent with Mozilla
__
Jerry McBride wrote:
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:43:12 -0800 Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So if you were to run "glxinfo" it lists that dri=yes ?
and what kind of fps are you getting with "glxgears -time" ?
Here's what I see for a Radeon 8500le 64meg:
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DR
On Monday 10 March 2003 03:40, Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:43:12 -0800 Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if you were to run "glxinfo" it lists that dri=yes ?
> > and what kind of fps are you getting with "glxgears -time" ?
>
> Here's what I see for a Radeon 8500le 64me
On Sunday 09 March 2003 10:40 pm, someone claiming to be Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:43:12 -0800 Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if you were to run "glxinfo" it lists that dri=yes ?
> > and what kind of fps are you getting with "glxgears -time" ?
>
> Here's what I se
On Sunday 09 March 2003 8:45 pm, someone claiming to be Kurt Wall wrote:
> Feigning erudition, Ted Ozolins wrote:
> % Kurt Wall wrote:
> %
> % >
> % >Naturally, if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces. It's always
> % >Just Worked (c) here. With the i810, the manual page says you only get
> % >ha
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:43:12 -0800 Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if you were to run "glxinfo" it lists that dri=yes ?
> and what kind of fps are you getting with "glxgears -time" ?
>
Here's what I see for a Radeon 8500le 64meg:
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20020827 AGP 4x
Feigning erudition, Ted Ozolins wrote:
% Kurt Wall wrote:
%
% >
% >Naturally, if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces. It's always
% >Just Worked (c) here. With the i810, the manual page says you only get
% >harware-accelerated 3D via DRI at 16bpp color. I'm unclear, however,
% >if you get DRI a
Kurt Wall wrote:
Naturally, if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces. It's always
Just Worked (c) here. With the i810, the manual page says you only get
harware-accelerated 3D via DRI at 16bpp color. I'm unclear, however,
if you get DRI at other depths (well, 24bpp) if you don't care about
hardwa
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 03/09/03 11:17, Kurt Wall wrote:
% >% any new devices in /dev/ needed to correspond to this?
% >
% >None that you create - the modules and kernel take care of this for you.
% >For the record, I have:
% >
% >$ ls -lR /dev/dri
% >crw-rw-rw-1 root roo
On 03/09/03 11:17, Kurt Wall wrote:
% any new devices in /dev/ needed to correspond to this?
None that you create - the modules and kernel take care of this for you.
For the record, I have:
$ ls -lR /dev/dri
crw-rw-rw-1 root root 226, 0 Dec 23 14:17 card0
and this happens without dev
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% On 03/09/03 06:53, Kurt Wall wrote:
% >Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% >% Good evening,
% >% Has anyone played with DRI at all? I'd really like a SxS on it, as i'd
% >% like to set it up with out trashing my X configuration.
% >
% >Not much to play
On 03/09/03 06:53, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% Good evening,
% Has anyone played with DRI at all? I'd really like a SxS on it, as i'd
% like to set it up with out trashing my X configuration.
Not much to play with, frankly. You need
- Kernel support for DRM
that's
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
% Good evening,
% Has anyone played with DRI at all? I'd really like a SxS on it, as i'd
% like to set it up with out trashing my X configuration.
Not much to play with, frankly. You need
- Kernel support for DRM
- A video adapter that supports DRI
- A 'Lo
Good evening,
Has anyone played with DRI at all? I'd really like a SxS on it, as i'd
like to set it up with out trashing my X configuration.
-Lonni
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Ste
32 matches
Mail list logo
