If I ever learn this Linux stuff well enough, maybe I will set it p as a
server. Funny, I origionally bought it because I heard the P-Pro's were
optimized for Windows NT (which I used in my business). Scary days!
What they meant by that was that PPro did a great job with 32-bit code
Pentium Pro's are 686's.
Tom Wilson
McSwain Carpets
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Please forgive me if, in the heat of battle, I sometimes forget which
side I'm on.
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 22:29, Harry G wrote:
Where does the line of
Not a P II? I thought the Pro topped out at 200. Intel had a P II 333
upgrade for Pros
(http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/DP081098.HTM) which
apparently fits in the Pro socket. As far as the question is concerned, it
doesn't matter--both are i686.
At 10:29 PM 3/31/03 -0500,
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 10:12 am, Stuart Biggerstaff wrote:
Not a P II? I thought the Pro topped out at 200. Intel had a P II 333
upgrade for Pros
That is what I did. Made a big difference, but I think I will have to bite
the bullet soon and gete a new system.
This one has been stone cold
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:55:52 -0500
Harry G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 10:56 am, Andrew Mathews wrote:
Harry G wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 10:12 am, Stuart Biggerstaff wrote:
Not a P II? I thought the Pro topped out at 200. Intel had a P II
333upgrade for
Where does the line of i586's end and i 686's begin?
I have an old Pentium Pro 333, and want to use proper file types.
Embaressingly ,
Harry G
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
