Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:10:36 -0500 Ben Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although everone has a favorite language. when designing such a system, one must compare cababilties, ease of programming, acceptance, and extensiability. Perl, being a favorite of many people, I find lacking in

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Richard R. Sivernell
I would suggest that you not use C, but C++ as this is much better for the reusability of source code. C is old coding. C++ is going to give you the greatest speed after ass lang. cheers -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Ben Duncan
No flame seen here Roger. I can do C, no can do C++ -- still a strange beast to me. I also find that some commercial C++ products do things a little differently than others. Also was unaware of Tcl/Tk's progression. REBOL is still a proprietary item, and I could not tell if anyone who used

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mpdickens spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: Sounds great to me! What do ya want to call this beast...?... OEDI- Open EDI OSEDI - Open Source EDI FREEDI (free dee eye) - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) -

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Douglas J Hunley spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: start w/ ANSI, implement a fairly recent Y2K compliant standard (but not too recent. maybe 3051?) doing the most heavily used (read most uh. I meant 4010. 3051 isn't y2k-ready, IIRC

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Duncan spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: REBOL is still a proprietary item, and I could not tell if anyone who used it was going to have buy some sort of runtime. sorry about that. things changed since last I looked at rebol.

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Gary Sublett
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:10:36 -0400 Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FREEDI (free dee eye) Hadn't noticed anyone mention this in the current EDI project discussion and don't know if it is pertient or not but thought it worth mentioning. *** Wal-Mart Mandates Secure,

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread m.w.chang
foxpro! yeah! harbour-project. :) Ben Duncan wrote: Although everone has a favorite language. when designing such a system, one must compare cababilties, -- .~.Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. In Linux we trust. / v \ news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org ^ ^