On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:35:23 -0500 Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to time the starts on three machines. The older version of
Star Office (6.0) let me count to 15 (one one thousand, two one thousand,
etc) before it was started on a 1 gig duron with 256meg. SO 5.2 on an .8
On SuSE, I have been using the OO pre-loader, or whatever it is called. It
does make loading faster. Odd that this seems not to be part of the SO 7
offering from Sun. At least not as an accessible item, as it is with OO.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 06:42:01 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:35:23 -0500
Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to time the starts on three machines. The older version of
Star Office (6.0) let me count to 15 (one one thousand, two one thousand,
etc) before it was started on a 1 gig duron with 256meg. SO 5.2 on an .8
StarOffice 7 user question:
I am curious about the quicker startup time for StarOffice 7. I am not
convinced mine is really faster than OpenOffice 1.1. Maybe this is how it
should be.
When your StarOffice 7 starts, you get the little startup box with a
progress bar. On mine, the window shows up
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 4:27 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
StarOffice 7 user question:
I am curious about the quicker startup time for StarOffice 7. I am not
convinced mine is really faster than OpenOffice 1.1. Maybe this is how
it should be.
When your StarOffice 7 starts, you get
because SO 7 removed
SO 6 when it was installed.
Joel
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:10:06AM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 4:27 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
StarOffice 7 user question:
I am curious about the quicker startup time for StarOffice 7. I am not
convinced
