-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 19:40:03 -0700
begin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
[ snips ]
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:42:26 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:57:00 +1000
begin Keith Antoine [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:57:00 +1000
begin Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on the same subnet using
the bridge tools, let me know and I'll
[ snips ]
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:42:26 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:57:00 +1000
begin Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on the same subnet
At 05:55 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
If you want to know how to put both Win boxes on the same subnet using the
bridge tools, let me know and I'll provide you a short SxS.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
I would appreciate that very much thank you, David.
Keith Antoine
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Bill Day wrote:
I know IPChains are old and IPTables latest. but PMFirewall is an awsome
little firewall script that does everything you ask. You may have to modify
the scritps after its installed do play certain games through the network
but other than that it works
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: another small problem with networking
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 14:16:22 +1000 Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a friend that has a linux box (mandrake9.0) and an XP plus a ME
connected. We can get
Skippy,
Did you set the default route in the Win boxes to the IP of the linux
Masquerade box?
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:16:22 +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
I have a friend that has a linux box (mandrake9.0) and an XP plus a ME
connected. We can get it to the stage where we can ping from
192.168.0.1
At 11:46 PM 4/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 14:16:22 +1000 Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All connections into the hub should be straight through cables, including the
server. The only exception is that if you stack hubs, some of them won't
have an
expansion port and
At 11:57 AM 5/01/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Skippy,
Did you set the default route in the Win boxes to the IP of the linux
Masquerade box?
Uhh, there is very little one can set in the windows boxes, so what is it
that I have to set
the gateway ? if so which one the eth0 or eth1 or is it the cable
You set the gateway to the address of whatever box is going to take care of
figuring out how to route the request. If you ask for something that is
not on your subnet one of the boxes has to be the guy who knows where to
send it - that's the gateway or router. In Windows terms it's the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 06:26:13 +1000
begin Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
[snip]
Maybe I got it wrong but we do not have a hub. We have 3 nics one for
the inet cable hookup
one for the ME machine one for the XP. So I have one
At 04:19 PM 5/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
You set the gateway to the address of whatever box is going to take care of
figuring out how to route the request. If you ask for something that is
not on your subnet one of the boxes has to be the guy who knows where to
send it - that's the gateway or
I have a friend that has a linux box (mandrake9.0) and an XP plus a ME
connected. We can get it to the stage where we can ping from
192.168.0.1 to either of the others (3 4) and from them to 1 or 2.
We have 2 inet cards installed in the linux box. However we cannot get to
the net from either of
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 14:16:22 +1000 Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a friend that has a linux box (mandrake9.0) and an XP plus a ME
connected. We can get it to the stage where we can ping from
192.168.0.1 to either of the others (3 4) and from them to 1 or 2.
We have 2 inet
14 matches
Mail list logo
