Re: glibc question

2003-10-22 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 06:09 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Tony Alfrey: Yes, I read the SXS. My principle question is . . . if I have applications complied earlier against glibc-2.2.1 and I install glibc-2.2.4, will the applications now crash? No. Going the other way -- apps compiled

Re: glibc question

2003-10-21 Thread Kurt Wall
Quoth Tony Alfrey: Yes, I read the SXS. My principle question is . . . if I have applications complied earlier against glibc-2.2.1 and I install glibc-2.2.4, will the applications now crash? No. Going the other way -- apps compiled against 2.2.4 running on a 2.2.1 system -- might not run,

glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Alfrey
Hi; I've got an app that wants libc.so.6 (which I have) but it tells me that it wants the version from glibc-2.2.4, while I have something a little older, like glibc-2.2.1. glibc-2.2.4 and all its parts is a big thing (maybe over 10 MB) and I seem to remember from the list that upgrading

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote: Hi; I've got an app that wants libc.so.6 (which I have) but it tells me that it wants the version from glibc-2.2.4, while I have something a little older, like glibc-2.2.1. glibc-2.2.4 and all its parts is a big thing (maybe over 10 MB) and I seem to

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Monday 20 October 2003 05:03 am, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote: Hi; I've got an app that wants libc.so.6 (which I have) but it tells me that it wants the version from glibc-2.2.4, while I have something a little older, like glibc-2.2.1. glibc-2.2.4 and all

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Monday 20 October 2003 07:31 am, Net Llama! wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote: snip Yes, I read the SXS. My principle question is . . . if I have applications complied earlier against glibc-2.2.1 and I install glibc-2.2.4, will the applications now crash? No. You're not

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Leon Goldstein
Net Llama! wrote: No. You're not removing glibc-2.2.1, you're just adding glibc-2.2.4. Have you tried the old symlink trick? -- Leon A. Goldstein Powered by Libranet 2.8 Debian Linux System G2 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: glibc question

2003-10-20 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Leon Goldstein wrote: Net Llama! wrote: No. You're not removing glibc-2.2.1, you're just adding glibc-2.2.4. Have you tried the old symlink trick? Which trick is that? -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman