On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Ken Moffat wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Woo-hoo. There was just a 3.8 quake centered 4 miles from where i live.
Felt like a good horizontal jolt for about 4 seconds.
whoa.. had one near Seattle a couple of years ago, pretty stimulating,
aren't they?
Yea, this is the
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Or.. Have you run a debugger against the programs to see if you can find
the actual line of code that is causing the fault? Maybe its a lib call
and you can pinpoint the lib that way.
I don't even have
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:ars47j$3gq$1@linux-
sxs.org:
you can possibly skip that step. certain steps in Mr. Parker's article
could be ignored. I got my dial-in pppd server working without doing
everything on the steps.
ls -al of /usr/sbin/pppd (or /sbin/pppd) should look
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:51:07PM +, DragonsFireBurns wrote:
[...]
When I do ;
ls -al of /usr/sbin/pppd (or /sbin/pppd) should look like this:
Try ls /usr/sbin/pppd /sbin/pppd
Kurt
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/25/2002 11:42 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
snip
Does this mean that the problem is with /lib/libpthread.so.0 ?
I think i've figured out (part of) thje problem. Somehow, and i've yet to
figure out how, when i was attempting to
On Monday 25 November 2002 08:39 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Sunday 24 November 2002 08:32 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Woo-hoo. There was just a 3.8 quake centered 4 miles from
where i live. Felt like a good horizontal jolt for about
seems to be that I cannot send
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL
Greetings,
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Keith Antoine wrote:
seems to be that I cannot send
Seems that you actually CAN! :-)
--- Jay
Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Ben Franklin (1759)
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 11/25/2002 11:42 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
snip
Does this mean that the problem is with /lib/libpthread.so.0 ?
I think i've figured out (part of) thje problem. Somehow, and i've yet
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Kurt Wall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:42:35AM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
Does this mean that the problem is with /lib/libpthread.so.0 ?
Possibly.
Nope, turned out to be the symlink:
/lib/libc.so.6 - /lib/libc-2.2.5.so
I still can't figure out how that got set
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 25 November 2002 08:39 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Sunday 24 November 2002 08:32 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Woo-hoo. There was just a 3.8 quake centered 4 miles from
where i
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:51:07PM +, DragonsFireBurns wrote:
[...]
When I do ;
ls -al of /usr/sbin/pppd (or /sbin/pppd) should look like this:
Try ls /usr/sbin/pppd /sbin/pppd
Kurt
That worked, thanks!
Andrew Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DragonsFireBurns wrote:
I'd just like to know what is generating the error you're seeing? Is
it a script you wrote, or something thac Redhat provided?
The tut was talking about testing the modem from remote machine
using
On 11/25/2002 2:05 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
snip
Actually i've upgraded to glibc-2.2.5 on 3 of my boxes in teh past 2
weeks. This is the only one that blewup.
My recomendation? Punt.
Assuming your data is backed up. Reinstall the
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, DragonsFireBurns wrote:
Andrew Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DragonsFireBurns wrote:
I'd just like to know what is generating the error you're seeing? Is
it a script you
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, DragonsFireBurns wrote:
Andrew Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DragonsFireBurns wrote:
I'd just like to know what is generating the error you're seeing? Is
it a script you wrote, or something thac Redhat provided?
The tut was talking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 November 2002 4:04 pm, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Robert Black Eagle wrote:
You have never read Tacitus or even much in Cicero or old man
Julius, have you. Compact seems not to apply to any of these,
except when Julius was being a
RBE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:mailman.86.1038256699.691.linux-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 November 2002 5:00 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
On 11/24/02 14:41, DragonsFireBurns wrote:
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL
On Monday 25 November 2002 11:22 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
snip
Cool! My wife is from Newark and I like Manhattan a lot. I'm not
sure I could handle the winters or rusted cars but if I had the
money to live in Manhattan itself, who cares about a
This is one of the more interesting web-logs I've seen lately... What
exactly IS Wal-Mart Connect 6.0? Is that the title given to the Lindows
machines? Or maybe it's actually a machine AT a Wal-Mart? I don't
know...
205.188.209.43 - - [21/Nov/2002:11:47:01 -0500] GET /public/EMail/
HTTP/1.0
I'm in the final stages of polishing off my vnc setup and find that I need a
little help in an area concerning GLX...
I'd like to squash this complaint when starting vncserver:
25/11/02 17:34:30 Xvnc version 3.3.5 - built Nov 13 2002 17:17:41
25/11/02 17:34:30 Copyright (C) 2002 RealVNC Ltd.
Have you looked at /usr/share/doc/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README
On 11/25/02 16:36, Jerry McBride wrote:
I'm in the final stages of polishing off my vnc setup and find that I need a
little help in an area concerning GLX...
I'd like to squash this complaint when starting vncserver:
25/11/02 17:34:30
So sorry, guys wrong support group.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:36:18 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in the final stages of polishing off my vnc setup and find that I need a
little help in an area concerning GLX...
--
--
How did the drives respond? - and XFS G.
Woo-hoo. There was just a 3.8 quake centered 4 miles from where i live.
Felt like a good horizontal jolt for about 4 seconds.
--
Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AKA Grunt
Registered Linux User #188143
Remove R777 to email
In RH 7.3 I've noticed that it links SCSI devices in what I consider a
strange way.
/dev/sg5 is linked to /dev/sdf (scanner)
/dev/sg3 is linked to /dev/sdg (tape library changer)
/dev/st is listed by the hardware browser for the tape drive in the tape
library but doesn't really exist!
Why
And the scanner has a dev /dev/scanner which is linked to /dev/sdf which is
linked to /dev/sg5!!
In RH 7.3 I've noticed that it links SCSI devices in what I consider a
strange way.
/dev/sg5 is linked to /dev/sdf (scanner)
/dev/sg3 is linked to /dev/sdg (tape library changer)
/dev/st
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:15:23PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
In RH 7.3 I've noticed that it links SCSI devices in what I consider a
strange way.
/dev/sg5 is linked to /dev/sdf (scanner)
/dev/sg3 is linked to /dev/sdg (tape library changer)
/dev/st is listed by the hardware browser
i was just reading some stuff rick moen wrote in connection with
wordperfect for linux -- he and i were discussing describe on another
list -- and i found that on
http://linuxmafia.com/wpfaq/problems.html#WONTINSTALL he links to the
sxs editors page. rick is not a lightweight by any means, so
Well, that's what I thought at first but I was desperately hoping there was
a reason for this madness! I'll redefine it to something sensible later.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:15:23PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
In RH 7.3 I've noticed that it links SCSI devices in what I consider a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 25 November 2002 3:07 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:38:07PM -0600, RBE wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sunday 24 November 2002 5:00 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
On 11/24/02 14:41, DragonsFireBurns wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 25 November 2002 3:05 pm, DragonsFireBurns wrote:
RBE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:mailman.86.1038256699.691.linux-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 November 2002 5:00 pm, Net Llama!
there is a tightvnc for speed
http//www.tightvnc.org (use google.com if my url is wrong)
Jerry McBride wrote:
So sorry, guys wrong support group.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\
32 matches
Mail list logo
