Re: FS statistics on 2.6.0-test2

2003-08-14 Thread Net Llama!
On 08/08/03 10:44, Matthew Carpenter wrote: Would you like to provide said information? I know you love XFS, but could you do an unbiased comparison for us? Sorry, i don't have the time, or the experience with Reiser. On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 06:58:21 -0700 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

FS statistics on 2.6.0-test2

2003-08-14 Thread Collins Richey
Interesting article and lots of critiques at http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/715 The following extract shows the basic differences. This is German number notation with commas and periods reversed. reiser4 reiserfs ext3 XFS JFS copy

Re: FS statistics on 2.6.0-test2

2003-08-14 Thread Jerry McBride
It makes you wonder what reiser4 isn't doing that reiser is.. :') I'm joking... As for ext3 being faster that xfs... hmmm... Not surprised. On Friday 08 August 2003 09:20 am, Collins Richey wrote: Interesting article and lots of critiques at http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/715 The

Re: FS statistics on 2.6.0-test2

2003-08-14 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Would you like to provide said information? I know you love XFS, but could you do an unbiased comparison for us? On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 06:58:21 -0700 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What would be far more telling would be a similar test on 2.4.21, with detailed information on the test

Re: FS statistics on 2.6.0-test2

2003-08-10 Thread Net Llama!
On 08/08/03 06:20, Collins Richey wrote: Interesting article and lots of critiques at http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/715 The following extract shows the basic differences. This is German number notation with commas and periods reversed. reiser4 reiserfs ext3