are these options available from make menuconfig?
James McDonald wrote:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The standard /boot/config-2.4.20-8 contains the above settings which is
fine what your problem is
--
.~.Might, Courage,
forget it. I found it.
M.W. Chang wrote:
are these options available from make menuconfig?
James McDonald wrote:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The standard /boot/config-2.4.20-8 contains the above settings which is
fine what your
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, M.W. Chang wrote:
are these options available from make menuconfig?
Yes. I'm not aware of any options that aren't.
James McDonald wrote:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The standard /boot/config-2.4.20-8 contains
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
# free
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
Mem:
Yes, but most stock kernels support up to 4GB, which is still more than 2GB
this guy's using...
- Original Message -
From: Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Maximum Memory in Linux
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper
Brian Simper wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
# free
total used free shared buffers
cached
Mem: 902768 672416 230352 0 45820
193564
-/+ buffers/cache: 433032
Simper, Brian D wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
At risk of suggesting the obvious, does your BIOS recognize all the
memory? Some machines have built-in hardware
...
- Original Message -
From: Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Maximum Memory in Linux
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:44:51 -0700
Simper, Brian D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free
command stubbornly says:
# free
total used free
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'stock' Redhat kernel suports no more than 1GB. SuSE kernels
might support more. Redhat includes a 'bigmem' kernel which supports
16GB.
kernels support up to:
1Gb, 4Gb, 64Gb depending on the kernel compile
wrote:
Yes, but most stock kernels support up to 4GB, which is still more than 2GB
this guy's using...
- Original Message -
From: Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Maximum Memory in Linux
On Wed
Before you go re-rolling kernels, check this out:
http://kb.redhat.com/view.php?eid=71
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Simper, Brian D wrote:
Is there a theoretical or functional maximum memory you can put in a
Linux machine? I have a server with 2GB installed but the free command
stubbornly says:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
The
13 matches
Mail list logo