On Thursday 28 March 2002 10:37 am, Myles Green wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 10:18:42 -0600
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which would result in better performance?
1. Swap on partition 1 of ATA 100 drive on ATA 133 controller with
OS on partition 2 of same drive.
2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
You can get some ideas from one of the HD How-to's (www.linuxdoc.org).
IIRC it was hard disk partitioning HowTo.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:39:40 -0600, Jason Joines wrote:
Mainly I was just curious as to whether the fact that the drive was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
You can get some ideas from one of the HD How-to's (www.linuxdoc.org).
IIRC it was hard disk partitioning HowTo.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:39:40 -0600, Jason Joines wrote:
Mainly I was just curious as to whether the fact that the drive was
--- Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mainly I was just curious as to whether the fact that the drive
was
on a separate contorller would override the fact that it is a slower
ATA-33 drive.
I do have that many drives requiring that many controllers. The
motherboard has 2
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 03:59, Net Llama wrote:
There's always a possibility that your swap partition may never be used
at all, depending on these other factors. Realistically, if you're this
concerned about disk performance, you should be using SCSI hardware, not
IDE.
I echo both your
