Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Harry G
Thanks for the info! I will check it out. Harry G On Friday April 12 2002 04:56 pm, you interfaced in analog form: 3 workstations, 1 laptop, and 2 servers. On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Harry G wrote: On a server, workstation, 200 workstations, etc. Harry G On Friday April 12 2002 04:44

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Andrew Mathews
Net Llama! wrote: ext3 ReiserFS are not the only journaling FS around. There's also XFS, and JFS. I use XFS, and have never had any problems. On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Harry G wrote: I am going to be setting up a new workstation, probably with Suse. I have a little experience with

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Net Llama!
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Andrew Mathews wrote: Net Llama! wrote: ext3 ReiserFS are not the only journaling FS around. There's also XFS, and JFS. I use XFS, and have never had any problems. On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Harry G wrote: I am going to be setting up a new workstation,

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Keith Antoine
On Friday 12 April 2002 04:33 pm, Harry G wrote: I am going to be setting up a new workstation, probably with Suse. I have a little experience with ext 3 file system (OK so far) but are there any advantages of one over the other? File integrity is the prime consideration, as apposed to

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Bill Campbell
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:33:15PM -0400, Harry G wrote: I am going to be setting up a new workstation, probably with Suse. I have a little experience with ext 3 file system (OK so far) but are there any advantages of one over the other? File integrity is the prime consideration, as apposed

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on April 12, Harry G managed to emit: I am going to be setting up a new workstation, probably with Suse. I have a little experience with ext 3 file system (OK so far) but are there any advantages of one over the other? File integrity is the prime consideration, as

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Net Llama!
Kurt Wall wrote: That said, allow me to recommend a book, Linux Filesystems, written by William von Hagen. It was written with a 2.4.9 kernel in mind, but the issues should be the same. He covers all of the major and some of the minor filesystems available for Linux. He also covers

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Net Llama!
Collins wrote: xfs questions 1) now that it's available in kernel source, is the version merged It is? When did that happen? That's great news from my perspective, as waiting for the patch is always a pain. into the kernel any better or worse than before? I used it briefly some time

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on April 12, Net Llama! managed to emit: Kurt Wall wrote: That said, allow me to recommend a book, Linux Filesystems, written by William von Hagen. It was written with a 2.4.9 kernel in mind, but the issues should be the same. He covers all of the major and some of

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Net Llama!
Kurt Wall wrote: Scribbling feverishly on April 12, Net Llama! managed to emit: Kurt Wall wrote: That said, allow me to recommend a book, Linux Filesystems, written by William von Hagen. It was written with a 2.4.9 kernel in mind, but the issues should be the same. He covers all of the major

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on April 12, Net Llama! managed to emit: Collins wrote: xfs questions 1) now that it's available in kernel source, is the version merged It is? When did that happen? That's great news from my perspective, as waiting for the patch is always a pain. Hmm, it's

Re: ext3 vs. reiserFS

2002-04-12 Thread Net Llama!
Kurt Wall wrote: Scribbling feverishly on April 12, Net Llama! managed to emit: Collins wrote: xfs questions 1) now that it's available in kernel source, is the version merged It is? When did that happen? That's great news from my perspective, as waiting for the patch is always a pain.