On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:04:23 -0500 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth James McDonald:
| But why is RMS so dogged about the distinction?
he has that far-away look of the true believer, the staunch idealogue
who is untroubled by minor details such as reality.
Ever the diplomt; I would
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Jack Berger wrote:
Good analogy on the sears tools bit, but we do use a lot of the gnu tools on our
solaris systems.
That's cause Solaris is almost unusable with the tools that are native to
the OS. Im still baffled to this day why anyone voluntarily uses Sun
hardware or
quoth Collins Richey:
| On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:04:23 -0500 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| quoth James McDonald:
| | But why is RMS so dogged about the distinction?
|
| he has that far-away look of the true believer, the staunch
| idealogue who is untroubled by minor details such as reality.
|
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 22:17, Michael Hipp wrote:
And he better wake up, IMHO, and realize that GNU and the GPL are very
much on the table in this SCO debacle.
He may start to get the idea when SCO's liars, er lawyers, show up with
the subpoena.
Cheers,
Shawn
http://www.forbes.com/2003/11/13/cz_dl_1113sco.html?partner=yahooreferrer=
Stallman says the Boston-based Free Software Foundation, which he
founded in 1985, has nothing to do with SCO's lawsuit. SCO is suing
IBM for violating a contract. We don't even know what the contract
said. In terms of
Consuming 1.3K bytes, dep blathered:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/11/13/cz_dl_1113sco.html?partner=yahooreferrer=
My favorite part:
Oddly enough, on Nov. 11, SCO Executive Vice President Christopher Sontag
complained to Forbes about IBM's decision to send subpoenas to investors
and analysts who
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:10:33 -0500 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stallman's GNU/Linux operating system ...
I am concerned about long-term entrenched confusions such as referring
to a version of our GNU OS as 'Linux'
RMS get stuffed!
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart
I guess he doesn't recognize that Linus had much to do with it. If it
weren't for Linus nobody would be using any of the GNU tools because there
wouldn't be anything to use them on G! I guess everything I've made with
my Sears tools I need to label Sears/whatever i- i.e Sears/workbench,
quoth James McDonald:
| But why is RMS so dogged about the distinction?
he has that far-away look of the true believer, the staunch idealogue
who is untroubled by minor details such as reality.
--
dep
Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever.
On Thursday 13 November 2003 10:26 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:10:33 -0500 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stallman's GNU/Linux operating system ...
I am concerned about long-term entrenched confusions such as referring
to a version of our GNU OS as 'Linux'
RMS get
I guess everything I've
made with my Sears tools I need to label Sears/whatever i- i.e
Sears/workbench, Sears/shelves.
I like the above ... lol.
Stallman's GNU/Linux operating system ...
I am concerned about long-term entrenched confusions such as
referring to a version of our GNU OS
Good analogy on the sears tools bit, but we do use a lot of the gnu tools on our
solaris systems.
And yes, rms does exhibit that far away look as dep describes.
-jhb-
From: Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess he doesn't recognize that Linus had much to do with it. If it
weren't for
James McDonald wrote:
I think Richard Stallman is carrying a rather large wound in his pride
because the hurd kernel has never taken off. Admittedly the tools GNU
provides are critical to the functioning and construction of the Linux
Kernel (please correct me if I'm wrong).
But why is RMS so
13 matches
Mail list logo
