On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:10:44 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes that showed it Tim, however as Lonni said I need the devel of that
which I cannot find anywhere.
I have the tarball of gtk+2.2.2 but it will not compile because the
glib version I have is incorrect. So I have
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 12:36 pm, Ted Ozolins wrote:
Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
rpm -ihv
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command
On 08/03/03 01:34, Keith Antoine wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
package, so I tried for
On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:51 am, Net Llama! wrote:
OK, so apparently mandrake named it 'gtk+2.0'. You still need to install
gtk+2.0-devel
Thats the real problem in that I am unable to find gtk+2.0-devel anywhere
online. Not in rpmfind or mandrake lists.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:54 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine
wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do
an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine wrote:
| On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:51 am, Net Llama! wrote:
|
|
|OK, so apparently mandrake named it 'gtk+2.0'. You still need to install
|gtk+2.0-devel
|
|
| Thats the real problem in that I am unable to find gtk+2.0-devel anywhere
|
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an rpm -q
gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the package, so I
tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
rpm -ihv --nodeps --force
Quoth Keith Antoine:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an rpm -q
gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the package, so I
tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm
Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an rpm -q
gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the package, so I
tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
rpm -ihv --nodeps --force gtk+2.0x.rpm
11 matches
Mail list logo
