On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 07:23:31AM -0500, Rick Sivernell wrote:
...
8 port hub at 10 mb
I've seen huge improvements in performance replacing hubs with switches,
particularly where there's a lot of NFS usage. The first time we did this
was about four years ago in an office where they had about
Tim Wunder wrote:
I spent much of this afternoon enabling NFS between my son's PC (Mandrak 8.0,
K6-2-500, 128MB RAM, kernel 2.4.3-mdk) and mine (Caldera 3.1, Athlon 950,
384MB RAM, kernel 2.4.9) and performance is slow, at best. We have 10 Megabit
ethernet with only the 2 PCs and our
Ian Marchak wrote:
SNIP
If you are running a 10Mb 4 port hub, you'll probably never get more
than 2.5 megabits of xfer no matter what you do. A hub divides the
total bandwidth (10Mb/s in your case) between all the ports evenly. A
10Mb/s switch on the other hand allocates 10Mb/s **per
I spent much of this afternoon enabling NFS between my son's PC (Mandrak 8.0,
K6-2-500, 128MB RAM, kernel 2.4.3-mdk) and mine (Caldera 3.1, Athlon 950,
384MB RAM, kernel 2.4.9) and performance is slow, at best. We have 10 Megabit
ethernet with only the 2 PCs and our gateway router (freesco --
On Saturday 08 September 2001 08:26 pm, you wrote:
I spent much of this afternoon enabling NFS between my son's PC (Mandrak
8.0, K6-2-500, 128MB RAM, kernel 2.4.3-mdk) and mine (Caldera 3.1, Athlon
950, 384MB RAM, kernel 2.4.9) and performance is slow, at best. We have 10
Megabit ethernet
Previously, Rick Sivernell chose to write:
On Saturday 08 September 2001 08:26 pm, you wrote:
I spent much of this afternoon enabling NFS between my son's PC (Mandrak
8.0, K6-2-500, 128MB RAM, kernel 2.4.3-mdk) and mine (Caldera 3.1, Athlon
950, 384MB RAM, kernel 2.4.9) and performance is
On September 8, 2001 06:26 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
From his PC, he can mount the NFS shares and navigate the direcotries, even
play some of the MP3s I have on my box. Directory navigation with Konqueror
is WAY slow, though, and if he tries to play one of the .WAVs I have,
performance is choppy
