On Wednesday 13 February 2002 09:12 pm, daddy wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2002 09:58, Ted wrote:
> > I ran across this once while using COL 2.4. There is no warning
> > that tells you that the user passwords have expired. Since I'm
> > always changing something or upgrading some package, I u
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 09:58, Ted wrote:
> I ran across this once while using COL 2.4. There is no warning
> that tells you that the user passwords have expired. Since I'm
> always changing something or upgrading some package, I use the root
> password a lot. Once logged in as root, I ent
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 08:49, Ian wrote:
>
>
> When passwords time out...you are/should be prompted to change
> them. They shouldn't just expire and lock users out.
I have yet to see a warning letting any user know that their password
will expire under my eD2.4 system. Do I need to set s
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 02:13, Ted wrote:
>
> I thought that in an earlier post it did state that " I have
> forgotten my password" I'm assuming that he meant the "root"
> password. I still think this is nothing more than client passwords
> timing out.
If I wrote that it was a mistake. I h
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 06:49 am, Ian wrote:
>
> When passwords time out...you are/should be prompted to change them.
> They shouldn't just expire and lock users out.
I ran across this once while using COL 2.4. There is no warning that tells
you that the user passwords have expired. Since
Ted Ozolins wrote:
>
> On Saturday 09 February 2002 07:14 pm, Net Llama wrote:
> > I think a key piece of info that is missing here is whether he has
> > simply forgetten the password(s), or if something occured to render
> > authentication broken.
> >
> > Tinkering with /etc/shadow may not be th
On Saturday 09 February 2002 07:14 pm, Net Llama wrote:
> I think a key piece of info that is missing here is whether he has
> simply forgetten the password(s), or if something occured to render
> authentication broken.
>
> Tinkering with /etc/shadow may not be the best idea, especially if this
>
--- daddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2002 07:34, Michael wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:23:49 -0500
> >
> > Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
> > >You may want to check your system for a "rootdisk" folder.
> > >Mike
> >
> > ===
Typing furiously on February 11, daddy managed to emit:
> On Sunday 10 February 2002 07:34, Michael wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:23:49 -0500
> >
> > Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
> > >You may want to check your system for a "rootdisk" folder.
> > >Mike
> >
>
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:36:16 -0600
daddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>On Sunday 10 February 2002 07:34, Michael wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:23:49 -0500
>>
>> Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>> >You may want to check your system for a "rootdi
On Sunday 10 February 2002 01:30, Ted wrote:
> On Saturday 09 February 2002 07:59 pm, daddy wrote:
> > I haven't forgotten my password. No member of my family can
> > access their account.
> >
> > How can I alter my boot up squence so that I boot up into single
> > user mode. Once I do, I would t
On Sunday 10 February 2002 07:34, Michael wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:23:49 -0500
>
> Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
> >You may want to check your system for a "rootdisk" folder.
> >Mike
>
> ===
> OOOPS! I meant "rootkit"
>
> Mike
If I have one wh
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:23:49 -0500
Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>You may want to check your system for a "rootdisk" folder.
>Mike
===
OOOPS! I meant "rootkit"
Mike
--
"Laws for the liberal education of youth, especially for the lower classes
of
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002 22:49:45 -0600
daddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
>OK this is what I did.
>
>Booted up into single user mode
>Reset the passwords for the users
>Rebooted in the previously broken system
>Logged in as if nothing had happened.
>
>So I have cured the symptom but s
On Saturday 09 February 2002 08:49 pm, daddy wrote:
> OK this is what I did.
>
> Booted up into single user mode
> Reset the passwords for the users
> Rebooted in the previously broken system
> Logged in as if nothing had happened.
>
> So I have cured the symptom but still don't have any clue as t
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002 20:29:04 -0800 (PST)
>> Will changing the 5 to 1 in this line of initab get me to boot up into
>> single
>> user run mode?
>> id:5:initdefault:
=
At the boot prompt type: linux 1
or
linux single
Mike
--
"Laws for the liberal education of yout
OK this is what I did.
Booted up into single user mode
Reset the passwords for the users
Rebooted in the previously broken system
Logged in as if nothing had happened.
So I have cured the symptom but still don't have any clue as to what
the cause was. I'll check my /var/log for any hints that
--- daddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2002, you wrote:
> > I think a key piece of info that is missing here is whether he has
> > simply forgetten the password(s), or if something occured to render
> > authentication broken.
> >
> > Tinkering with /etc/shadow may not be the best i
--- daddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2002, Net Llama wrote:
> > I think a key piece of info that is missing here is whether he has
> > simply forgetten the password(s), or if something occured to render
> > authentication broken.
> >
> > Tinkering with /etc/shadow may not be the
On Sat, 09 Feb 2002, you wrote:
> I think a key piece of info that is missing here is whether he has
> simply forgetten the password(s), or if something occured to render
> authentication broken.
>
> Tinkering with /etc/shadow may not be the best idea, especially if this
> is simply a matter of a
On Saturday 09 February 2002 22:59 pm, daddy wrote:
> I haven't forgotten my password. No member of my family can access their
> account.
>
> How can I alter my boot up squence so that I boot up into single user mode.
> Once I do, I would then use the COAS tools to re-enter the passwords?
I wo
On Sat, 09 Feb 2002, Net Llama wrote:
> I think a key piece of info that is missing here is whether he has
> simply forgetten the password(s), or if something occured to render
> authentication broken.
>
> Tinkering with /etc/shadow may not be the best idea, especially if this
> is simply a matte
I think a key piece of info that is missing here is whether he has
simply forgetten the password(s), or if something occured to render
authentication broken.
Tinkering with /etc/shadow may not be the best idea, especially if this
is simply a matter of a forgetten password, where booting into sing
You could try editing your password files.
Look at /etc/shadow.
For example:
andrew:s52TAIl4IT.:11314:0:-1:7:-1:-1:134535852
aph5::11476:0:-1:7:-1:-1:134535844
user aph5 has no password and you can log on with just the user name.
Joel
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 12:32:44PM -0600, daddy w
Even though this a Linux list, we Linux users are always concerned for
our brethren who are in error (Windows Users). The most obvious
solution would be to switch to a Linux OS. SuSe is German made and is
user friendly. But, your problem may not be with your Win system ( such
as I hate to say it)
" > > Something funky about these rtl8139 cards and this particular
I'm running some of these. I had some of the half-duplex trouble a
while ago but they all run fine now. They're on monolithic kernels
and they're autodetected fine, no need to pass any append=
parameters... Memory fades,
Jerry,
Sure. But the interesting thing is they DO work with the SuSE
2.4.4-4GB kernel using the EXACT same driver. Tell me where you
want me to send it. BTW,it is a new realtek card from SMC.
Regards,
Keith
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 20:50:08 -0500
>[EMAIL P
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:48:16 -0700
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:28:56 -0800 (PST) Keith Morse
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Jerry,
> > >
> > > I finally just gave up and purchased a NetGear FA310T
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:28:56 -0800 (PST) Keith Morse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Jerry,
> >
> > I finally just gave up and purchased a NetGear FA310TX fast
> ethernet
> > card from Micro Center on sale for $14.99. It uses the tulip
> driver an
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 20:50:08 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I finally just gave up and purchased a NetGear FA310TX fast ethernet
> card from Micro Center on sale for $14.99. It uses the tulip driver and
> upon installation, I am now running 100 mbps FD without forcing it to.
> Somet
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I finally just gave up and purchased a NetGear FA310TX fast ethernet
> card from Micro Center on sale for $14.99. It uses the tulip driver and
> upon installation, I am now running 100 mbps FD without forcing it to.
> Something funky abou
Jerry,
I finally just gave up and purchased a NetGear FA310TX fast ethernet
card from Micro Center on sale for $14.99. It uses the tulip driver and
upon installation, I am now running 100 mbps FD without forcing it to.
Something funky about these rtl8139 cards and this particular box, no
trouble
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 07:19:25 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> It is the latest included with the 2.4.16 kernel. I do have a CD with
> instructions on compiling the driver for linux that came with the card.
> It is dated 6/1999. Should I compile it and see if it works?
>
It's worth a
Jerry,
It is the latest included with the 2.4.16 kernel. I do have a CD with
instructions on compiling the driver for linux that came with the card.
It is dated 6/1999. Should I compile it and see if it works?
Regards,
Keith B.
Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:27:40 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have followed the thread on forcing my NIC to run full duplex. I have
> tried all of those suggestions to no avail. I have SuSE 7.3 Pro installed
> on my desktop w/KDE-2.2.2, and Mantel's 2.4.16-4GB-14. Using mii-to
Agreed, unless you have a small internal network like mine and just need to get
it going. For secure networks, you absolutely want to configure more security
and use encrypted passwords.
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:01:52 -0800
> David Aikema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 22 November
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:01:52 -0800
David Aikema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 22 November 2001 07:33 am, Susan Macchia wrote:
>
> > Ok, first I got rid of the use of encrypted passwords on my Win2k box. To
> > do this, on your Win2k box run "regedit". When the window opens pick
(fro
On Thursday 22 November 2001 07:33 am, Susan Macchia wrote:
> Ok, first I got rid of the use of encrypted passwords on my Win2k box. To
> do this, on your Win2k box run "regedit". When the window opens pick (from
> the left panel):
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE->SYSTEM->CurrentControlSet->Services->la
Ian,
I have successfully gotten Samba 2.2.1 to work with Win2k and SuSE 7.3. I am
sure that it is similar to RH. I used the Samba How-to to get going
(http://www.linux.com/howto/SMB-HOWTO.html#toc7). I had to transition what I
had on COL2.4/RH 7.0 which had older versions of Samba connected to
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 07:00, you scribed:
> Did you print this from Netscape? I did for som page at IBM and got
> the same thing without CUPS. So it was something in Netscape. In my
> case, Netscape 6 something. I don't know if konqueror does the same
> thing.
Yes I am sure I did so will
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 20:43:42 -0400
Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I have just installed mandrake 8.0 and I installed the printer woth
| cups. I have just printed out some web pages and believe me I cannot
| read them.
|
| The font is so small its not readable without a magnifier, n
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:29:55 -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
>My brain finally kicked in gear. I haven't run Caldera in a while.
>If you reinstall X, you can then run startx just like on a normal
>distro.
After installing XF86 4.1.0 from source on my COL 3.1 box, I was able
to start X as a user.
I suspect this is the file:
/opt/kde2/share/config/kdmrc
As to bugs in the KDE session stuff, I have had and sorted out the
following odd problem.
I have installed kde2 versions from generic source for the last few
releases. It seems that each successive release handled whatever
config
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 23:25:20 -0400
dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
> do have a couple more off at the agent right now, though, both of
> which would surprise you. and no, neither is entitled "shipwrecked
> cheerleaders."
==
h, but do let us know when you've
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:29:55PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
...
>My brain finally kicked in gear. I haven't run Caldera in a while.
>If you reinstall X, you can then run startx just like on a normal
>distro.
It's a lot easier than that with Caldera 3.1. I posted details
on how to do this a
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:43:07 -0700 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 06:10 pm,Collins Richey wrote:
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:08:13 -0600
> > From: Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >
> > Of course, there's always the p
On Monday 10 September 2001 08:25 pm,dep wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 23:09, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> | If I go into runlevel 3 and startx, I get an xterm window. Then I
> | can start kde within the xterm window, but I have the xterm window
> | stuff still floating around. How can I startx a
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 23:25:20 -0400, dep wrote:
>do have a couple more off at the agent right now, though, both of
>which would surprise you. and no, neither is entitled "shipwrecked
>cheerleaders."
Damn, I was hoping. ;-)
___
http://linux.nf --
On Monday 10 September 2001 06:33 pm,Bill Day wrote:
> Dont know if this is the one your looking for but on th e linux.nf
> mirror the file containing your login choices(eD2.4) was
> /etc/rc.d/rc.gui
Hmmm, not there in mine. Jonathan Wilson found them in
/opt/kde2/share/config/kdm/kdmrc
Thank
On Monday 10 September 2001 06:10 pm,Collins Richey wrote:
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:08:13 -0600
> From: Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Of course, there's always the problem with the latest Caldera
> offering, since they don't allow normal mode users to star
On Monday 10 September 2001 23:09, Tony Alfrey wrote:
| If I go into runlevel 3 and startx, I get an xterm window. Then I
| can start kde within the xterm window, but I have the xterm window
| stuff still floating around. How can I startx and then start kde
| and not have the extra xterm stuff?
On Monday 10 September 2001 06:02 pm,JW wrote:
> Here, I got impatient and did some of the work for you.
>
> From /etc/opt/kde2/share/config/kdm/kdmrc (Notice: This is from a
> SuSE 7.2 box )
Oh, now THAT is cool! This is, indeed, the file that gets rewritten.
And this explains why it got co
On Monday 10 September 2001 05:56 pm,JW wrote:
> Presuming that it is indeed xdm, try rpm -ql kdebase. Those are the
> files most likely to pertain to your situation. you can run rpm -qf
> /opt/kde2/bin/kdm to make sure it's kdebase in your case. Likewise
> for xdm, if you find that to be what's
On Monday 10 September 2001 05:43 pm,dep wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 20:19, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> | Your help would be greatly appreciated!!
>
> do what your old dad here has been preaching for *years*: forget that
> phony baloney graphical login nonsense, set the default runlevel to
> 3,
Dont know if this is the one your looking for but on th e linux.nf mirror the
file containing your login choices(eD2.4) was /etc/rc.d/rc.gui
HTH
On Monday 10 September 2001 19:19, you wrote:
> I have made a mess!
--
Bill Day A.K.A. BadMan
RLU#188133 RLM#83358 http://coun
At 07:56 PM 9/10/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Don't forget that strace is your friend too. You could, from runlevel 3, run strace
>-o kdm.strace /opt/kde2/bin/kdm and then kill it, and grep through it for all the
>files it happened to look in.
>
>Have you recursively grepped through /etc and /usr for
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:08:13 -0600
From: Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help starting KDE2.2
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:43:07 -0400 dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 20:19, Tony Alfrey wro
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:43:07 -0400 dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2001 20:19, Tony Alfrey wrote:
>
> | Your help would be greatly appreciated!!
>
> do what your old dad here has been preaching for *years*: forget
> that
> phony baloney graphical login nonsense, set the
At 05:19 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>I have made a mess!
Welcome to the crew :-)
>Following the kde list advice about compiling kde2.2, I got rid of my
>old /opt/kde2 directory and made a clean one. Then I compiled kdelibs,
>kdebase and kdenetwork, although libs and base should have been
On Monday 10 September 2001 20:19, Tony Alfrey wrote:
| Your help would be greatly appreciated!!
do what your old dad here has been preaching for *years*: forget that
phony baloney graphical login nonsense, set the default runlevel to
3, and type startx yourself.
--
dep
one day, you'll wi
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001 08:06:20 +1130
Hello Mike from Lourens:
[snip]
" On Sunday 26 August 2001 07:34, Lourens Steenkamp wrote:
"
" > /dev/hde1 /media/zip vfatrw,noauto,user,exec 0 0
"
" that's a new wrinkle. The proprietary iomega formatting 'shows'
" multiple
" partition
Mike Andrew wrote:
> On Sunday 26 August 2001 05:53, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> > I am running Caldera eW3.1 and have an internal atapi zip drive on hdd4.
> > The problem is that I can't mount it. I have tried as user and root but
> > it gives me an error saying "mount /dev/hdd4 is not a valid block
Mike Andrew wrote:
> On Sunday 26 August 2001 05:53, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> > I am running Caldera eW3.1 and have an internal atapi zip drive on hdd4.
> > The problem is that I can't mount it. I have tried as user and root but
> > it gives me an error saying "mount /dev/hdd4 is not a valid block
How about
append="hdd=ide-floppy"
in lilo.conf
On Saturday 25 August 2001 14:01, Tim Wunder wrote:
> Nope. Beats me. Like I said, I don't have a Zip drive. Unless, of course,
> you don't actually HAVE a zip disk inserted into the drive, you certainly
> can't mount something that's not there.
> A
No zip as well, but if your using ide-floppy to control off of, wouldnt you
want a moint point of /dev/fd1(assuming that you have a std. floppy disk in
system as well).
Just an idea..
On Saturday 25 August 2001 14:01, you wrote:
> Nope. Beats me. Like I said, I don't have a Zip drive. Unless,
On Sunday 26 August 2001 07:34, Lourens Steenkamp wrote:
> /dev/hde1 /media/zip vfatrw,noauto,user,exec 0 0
that's a new wrinkle. The proprietary iomega formatting 'shows' multiple
partitions, of which #4 has been traditionally used by Linux. I wasn't aware
of #1 being as usabl
On Sunday 26 August 2001 05:53, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> I am running Caldera eW3.1 and have an internal atapi zip drive on hdd4.
> The problem is that I can't mount it. I have tried as user and root but
> it gives me an error saying "mount /dev/hdd4 is not a valid block
> device". I did lsmod and i
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 11:23:38 -0700
Hello Vern from Lourens:
My configs for comparison:
[1]
dmesg |more
tells me where it is located, nl,
hde: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI, ATAPI FLOPPY drive
[2]
/etc/fstab entry for the above is,
/dev/hde1 /media/zip vfatrw,noauto,user,exec 0 0
It sh
Nope. Beats me. Like I said, I don't have a Zip drive. Unless, of course, you
don't actually HAVE a zip disk inserted into the drive, you certainly can't
mount something that's not there.
Are you sure its hdd, slave on the secondary IDE chain?
Good luck,
Tim
Previously, Vern W Heesch wrote:
>
Ok, tried changing to /dev/hdd and get the same type of response/dev/hdd is not a
valid
block device. Any other thoughts?
Vern
Tim Wunder wrote:
> You've partitioned your zip disk?
> Wouldn't /dev/hdd4 be the fourth partition on hdd?
> I would think you just want 'mount /dev/hdd '
> But,
You've partitioned your zip disk?
Wouldn't /dev/hdd4 be the fourth partition on hdd?
I would think you just want 'mount /dev/hdd '
But, I don't have a zip disk.
HTH,
Tim
Previously, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> I am running Caldera eW3.1 and have an internal atapi zip drive on hdd4.
> The problem is
On Friday 10 August 2001 00:33, Bruce Marshall wrote:
[snip]
> On Thursday 09 August 2001 08:45, Kurt Wall wrote:
[snip]
wow, IF I open the xxx.pdf with xpdf, save it to file as a (dot) ps and open
_that_ file with Kghostview and print it, all is fine.
If i simply open the original (dot) pdf wi
On Thursday 09 August 2001 08:45, Kurt Wall wrote:
> In the last episode, we heard Mike Andrew say:
> > can someone help me please. if i try and print (via ghostview) to my
> > laserjet, the printer just blinks at me. I have no trouble printing in
> > general, just (apparently) massaged postrcrpt
In the last episode, we heard Mike Andrew say:
> can someone help me please. if i try and print (via ghostview) to my
> laserjet, the printer just blinks at me. I have no trouble printing in
> general, just (apparently) massaged postrcrpt files.
When a printer winks at you, be afraid, be very a
ok. correction: there is nothing wrong with console mode admin
via telnet or secured remote-shells
Net Llama wrote:
> --- Linuxism Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>btw, there is nothing wrong with telnet.. :)
> Other than the fact that its a huge gaping security risk.
__
--- Linuxism Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> btw, there is nothing wrong with telnet.. :)
Other than the fact that its a huge gaping security risk.
=
Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux FAQ &
btw, there is nothing wrong with telnet.. :)
Jim Conner wrote:
> You're welcome. I ran into an empty Control Center once while updating
> kde2.x, also some of the apps didn't be have quite correctly. I was told
> then(not sure from where) to do this and it worked for me. Glad it worked
> f
You're welcome. I ran into an empty Control Center once while updating
kde2.x, also some of the apps didn't be have quite correctly. I was told
then(not sure from where) to do this and it worked for me. Glad it worked
for you.
Jim
On Thursday July 26, 2001 6:35 pm, Rick Sivernell wrote:
>
On Thursday 26 July 2001 18:27, you wrote:
> What you probably need to do is move $HOME/.kde2 to $HOME/.kde_backup. Log
> out of the user and log back in. This will reset all the settings and
> stuff for kde. The config files for kde and various apps are in
> $HOME/.kde2/share/config/*. Be car
What you probably need to do is move $HOME/.kde2 to $HOME/.kde_backup. Log
out of the user and log back in. This will reset all the settings and stuff
for kde. The config files for kde and various apps are in
$HOME/.kde2/share/config/*. Be careful what config files you move back
because on
KDE2.1.1 runs fine here on caldera 2.4
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:29:43 -0500
Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List
>
> KDE is so fxx bad. It now looses it self. Can not set
configuration
> in Control center. Set config in kmail and logoff relogin you reset
kmail
> configs. Thi
On Thursday 26 July 2001 08:29, Rick Sivernell wrote:
> List
>
> KDE is so fxx bad. It now looses it self. Can not set configuration
> in Control center. Set config in kmail and logoff relogin you reset kmail
> configs. This is nonsense and is totally bad code. It can not have been
> teste
As much as I'd love to blame this on KDE, i think you caused this mess.
You can't copy .kde2 to .kde. The configuration file layout changed in
a huge way. So basically what is occuring is that KDE2 is looking for
the appropriate config file to write the changes you are making, isn't
finding it,
On Monday 23 July 2001 19:12, Net Llama babbled:
> Folks, make this exhibit A on why you should never play with partitions
> that have data on them.
>
> Doug, i realize that you had little choice, since you had a dead HD on
> your hands. But when people give me dirty looks for warning them not to
Folks, make this exhibit A on why you should never play with partitions
that have data on them.
Doug, i realize that you had little choice, since you had a dead HD on
your hands. But when people give me dirty looks for warning them not to
resize partitions, this is why. Its playing with fire.
On Sunday 22 July 2001 13:17, Net Llama babbled:
> Wow, what a mess. I think the key to the kingdom here is what you used
> to play with the partitions (resizing etc). Whatever that was, it
> royally fuxored your partition table. Hopefully its not partition
> magic.
>
> Doug, if you're really d
Wow, what a mess. I think the key to the kingdom here is what you used
to play with the partitions (resizing etc). Whatever that was, it
royally fuxored your partition table. Hopefully its not partition
magic.
Doug, if you're really desperate for a working HD, i could have one in
your hands by
On Sunday 22 July 2001 01:35, Jim Conner babbled:
> In the BIOS there are usually two places to set auto for detecting the hard
> drive. That's to get the C/H/S and to see what, if any, translation needs
> to be done. These settings are usually Normal, LBA, Auto, etc. This might
> be the proble
In the BIOS there are usually two places to set auto for detecting the hard
drive. That's to get the C/H/S and to see what, if any, translation needs to
be done. These settings are usually Normal, LBA, Auto, etc. This might be
the problem that is occuring between the bios and the kernel.
Ji
On Friday 20 July 2001 07:37 am, you wrote:
> On Friday 20 July 2001 12:14, Rick Sivernell wrote:
> > List
> >
> > trying to upgrade python to the 2.1.5 version. I get the following:
>
> [hackety slash]
>
> > [root@RRSivernell python]# find / -name "libdb-3.1.so"
>
> [snip]
>
> > does any one kn
On Friday 20 July 2001 12:14, Rick Sivernell wrote:
> List
>
> trying to upgrade python to the 2.1.5 version. I get the following:
[hackety slash]
> [root@RRSivernell python]# find / -name "libdb-3.1.so"
[snip]
> does any one know where I get these libs for the Caldera eWorkstation 3.1
they
On Thursday 19 July 2001 09:16 pm, you wrote:
> --- Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > List
> >
> > trying to upgrade python to the 2.1.5 version. I get the following:
> > [root@RRSivernell python]# rpm -Uvh python2-2.1-5.i386.rpm
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > libcrypto.
--- Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List
>
> trying to upgrade python to the 2.1.5 version. I get the following:
> [root@RRSivernell python]# rpm -Uvh python2-2.1-5.i386.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> libcrypto.so.0.9.6 is needed by python2-2.1-5 found in >>
> /usr
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Mike Andrew
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 8:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Help with PDF files
>
>
> On Wednesday 18 July 2001 06:34, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> > Didn't d
Just wondering...
If your documents actually are .TXTs--i.e. with no inherent formatting--why
do you need to convert them to .PDF? They should be usable as they are on
essentially any platform, including browsers. I recently had to buy a
couple of copies of Acrobat because patrons "didn't wa
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 06:34, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> Didn't dawn on me that txt files contain no formatting. Sooo, any ideas on
> something that CAN write to PDF and maintain the original formatting? I
> tried a few searches but only came up with the Adobe windows program. But I
> don't want to
Bruce Marshall wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2001 15:56, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> > Net Llama wrote:
> > > --- Vern W Heesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > >
> > > > > Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Plu
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:22:38 -0400
Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2001 15:56, Vern W Heesch wrote:
> > Net Llama wrote:
> > > --- Vern W Heesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > >
> > > >
xv has never been able to read layered TIFFs. StarOffice, oddly, can
read them though.
--- Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would really like to learn to use the convert program that comes
> with
> caldera 2.4. I just can't seem to figure it out from the man page. For
> example, I can'
I would really like to learn to use the convert program that comes with
caldera 2.4. I just can't seem to figure it out from the man page. For
example, I can't figure out how to make a number of tiff files into one big
tiff file. I follow the directions but no joy. If I try to combine two
files, t
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
