Re: OT Volume Down?

2001-11-17 Thread Burns MacDonald

Keith wrote:
 On Saturday 17 November 2001 01:20, Douglas J Hunley enunciated:

   I had resubbed to Caldera lists as well and I can say that there is a
   definite drop in posts to both lists over the past 4 weeks or so.
 
  we're only about half of the pre-crash membership. does anyone know how
to
  get word out to the rest?

 Depends on how interested we as list members are in the list itself. I
would
 hazzard a guess that most of us have mail going back for a month or so. In
 that case we as members could troll the trash and see who was on and is
not
 now. The trash would always have their 'HOME' address on it, also would
the
 mailer have a list of who was originally subbed or was this lost too ?

We could also (again) put a very bold notice on the steps main page. Most
readers go there at least occaisionally.

--
burns


___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-17 Thread Susan Macchia

Hi Keith,

I do have a 2nd cd writer which VMware fails to see on initial installation.  I
set it up as a scsi cdrom device and I can read from it, but have yet not tried
to write to it.  Since I use gcombust, etc, it is a lower priority for me and I
haven't searched the website or asked them about support for it.  Also, I get
no sound.  But I really don't need it for those things yet.  I want to set up a
win98 version for my son to use his educational software with, and that will
need sound.  I'll let you know when I get to that point.

I also have problems with /dev/lp0, so for now I am using Samba to print, but I
eventually want to understand why it can't connect to that port.

Again, even with these limitations, the fact that it runs without booting into
a specialized kernel is a plus to me.  Not that I have time to roll my own, but
I want to be able to play without having to worry that I can't run my critical
window's apps.

Hope this helps

Keith Antoine wrote:

 On Saturday 17 November 2001 03:20, Susan Macchia enunciated:
 I would highly recommend VMware.  I just installed SuSE 7.3 (really slick
 by the way - I am real happy w/ it) and am evaluating VMware 3.0.  I have
 found that it is a really slick product; easy to configure and set up.  Its
 performance is pretty good (its running on a pentium II 400 mhz with 384MB
 of RAM).  Installation of the OS and any optional software is kind of slow,
 but other than that it is like a real small machine on the desktop.

 I've been recently using it to test my Samba configuration (so I don't have
 to kick my kids off they're win2k box).  I installed it with win2k.  It
 runs like a champ and I don't have to boot into a specialized kernel (like
 with Win4Lin).

 Hi Suuzz g

 Just want to talk a bit re Vmware and your config. Do you have the second,
 usually writer being seen by vmware ? Have you heard if a burner can operate
 in vmware as I have to burn my vcd's in nero on windows.

 I have managed to get quicktime, shockwave and many other plugins working on
 linux using codeweavers crossover. Nice to play the trailers form the apple
 site natively online at last.

 So I do not have the use for windows much now since the release of SO6, but I
 do need to use Flaskmpeg and TMPGEnc. As I only got my version 3.0 rego
 numbers today I have not had a chance to try these in vmware but am sure they
 will be very slow converting mpegs.


=
_
Susan Macchia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_

- Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots...

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: New Kernel, Now No Text Console, SuSE 7.3

2001-11-17 Thread Lee

Jason Joines wrote:

  I compiled a 2.4.10 kernel from kernel.org source with XFS
 filesystem patches from SGI.  When I boot the machine, I get the
 graphical chooser that allows me pick a kernel to boot.  If I boot the
 2.4.10 SuSE kernel, all works as expected.  If I boot the 2.4.10 XFS
 kernel, output to the monitor disappears just as soon as I select that
 kernel.  Everything is still running as I can SSH into the box, run X
 apps, backup software, mount XFS filesystems, etc.  I can't seem to
 find any errors in the logs.  If I start X, it runs like normal on vt07
 but there is nothing on any of the other vt's.  Any ideas?

 Jason Joines

Yeah. Stick with 2.4.10 if it does the job for you.


 ---

 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-17 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Saturday 17 November 2001 9:21 am, Susan Macchia wrote:
 Again, even with these limitations, the fact that it runs without booting
 into a specialized kernel is a plus to me.  Not that I have time to roll my
 own, but I want to be able to play without having to worry that I can't run
 my critical window's apps.

I'm curious as to what type of VMW disk you built and whether you had to 
format it.

I was using 2.0.4 and had one of their special 'plain' disks and I don't ever 
recall having to partition or format it.  It was 4GB in size.

Now, moving to 3.0, I built a new 'virtual' disk of 4.4GB and had to 
partition and format it before it was visible to VMW.  Didn't think that 
would be necessary.  But I was blown away by being able to run Partition 
Magic (virtually) to partition it.  Worked flawlessly by booting the PM 
diskettes.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 11/17/01 10:31  +
++
Insomnia isn't anything to lose sleep over.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Mozilla shtml

2001-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat


Anyone have trouble getting Mozilla 0.9.5 to do shtml?
It seems to have worked in the past, (0.9.3) but I could be wrong.

(I'm using a Debian flavor of linux, Libranet, and apt-get found
Mozilla 0.9.5 on the ximian site, I think.)

-- 
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Mozilla shtml

2001-11-17 Thread Net Llama

I don't think i've had problems, but i've never noticed.  Do you have a
specific website in mind where its not working?

--- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Anyone have trouble getting Mozilla 0.9.5 to do shtml?
 It seems to have worked in the past, (0.9.3) but I could be wrong.
 
 (I'm using a Debian flavor of linux, Libranet, and apt-get found
 Mozilla 0.9.5 on the ximian site, I think.)



=

Lonni J. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux Step-by-step help:   http://netllama.ipfox.com

 .

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: replacing win98

2001-11-17 Thread Keith Antoine

On Sunday 18 November 2001 00:21, Susan Macchia enunciated:
 Hi Keith,

 I do have a 2nd cd writer which VMware fails to see on initial
 installation.  I set it up as a scsi cdrom device and I can read from it,
 but have yet not tried to write to it.  Since I use gcombust, etc, it is a
 lower priority for me and I haven't searched the website or asked them
 about support for it.  Also, I get no sound.  But I really don't need it
 for those things yet.  I want to set up a win98 version for my son to use
 his educational software with, and that will need sound.  I'll let you know
 when I get to that point.

With the writer I can add it in but it sees the two dives but acts as if they 
ate one , real wierd. As for sound, I get broken or non in Mandrake 8.1, get 
sound in Suse but on reboot it looses it and I haver to reinstall in linux 
then is sees it on boot it might say its busy. not real worried here about 
either. 

 I also have problems with /dev/lp0, so for now I am using Samba to print,
 but I eventually want to understand why it can't connect to that port.

again i am not worried but it says its busy because lp0 is occupied by the 
linux printcap.

 Again, even with these limitations, the fact that it runs without booting
 into a specialized kernel is a plus to me.  Not that I have time to roll my
 own, but I want to be able to play without having to worry that I can't run
 my critical window's apps.

Yes, its fine as can and do run what I need from windows which is getting 
less and less. I have DVD and VCD's playing from linux now plus I can use 
quicktime, shockwave, see winword and excel from netscape with crossover.
Must say that its getting to the stage where I will not need to reboot to do 
what I want.


-- 
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Mozilla shtml

2001-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat


On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't think i've had problems, but i've never noticed.  Do you have a
 specific website in mind where its not working?

On www.fidelity.com, when I try to login (link at top of page) the link
does nothing.
On www.qualstarcu.com, same thing. (home banking direct link).
These are the only 2 I've tried, and both are https:// links.
 
 --- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Anyone have trouble getting Mozilla 0.9.5 to do shtml?
  It seems to have worked in the past, (0.9.3) but I could be wrong.
  
  (I'm using a Debian flavor of linux, Libranet, and apt-get found
  Mozilla 0.9.5 on the ximian site, I think.)
 
 
 
 =
 
 Lonni J. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Linux Step-by-step help:   http://netllama.ipfox.com
 
  .
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
 http://personals.yahoo.com
 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
 


-- 
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Mozilla shtml

2001-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat

On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:13:39 -0500
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Previously, Ken Moffat chose to write:
  Anyone have trouble getting Mozilla 0.9.5 to do shtml?
  It seems to have worked in the past, (0.9.3) but I could be wrong.
 
  (I'm using a Debian flavor of linux, Libranet, and apt-get found
  Mozilla 0.9.5 on the ximian site, I think.)
  
 I'd try a nightly,
 ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-trunk

I'll try it. thanks.
-- 
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Mozilla shtml

2001-11-17 Thread Ken Moffat

Tried it and it works... Thanks for the advice.
Ken



On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:13:39 -0500
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Previously, Ken Moffat chose to write:
  Anyone have trouble getting Mozilla 0.9.5 to do shtml?
  It seems to have worked in the past, (0.9.3) but I could be wrong.
 
  (I'm using a Debian flavor of linux, Libranet, and apt-get found
  Mozilla 0.9.5 on the ximian site, I think.)
  
 I'd try a nightly,
 ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-trunk
 and see if the problem still exists there. 


-- 
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users