Re: Unicode in Emacs again

2001-11-04 Thread Florian Weimer
Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does 'via surrogate pair' mean? I guess the second line should read: 00 Unicode 20bit (U+1 - U+F) Yes. That's correct, and the third line shoud read as below:

Re: Unicode in Emacs again

2001-10-31 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Private area is 18h - 3087FFh These are the characters from 1 1000 to 11 1111 . Is this range intentional? It looks rather strange. I don't remember well. :-( Perhaps to fill code-space for CNS 3-16 and CCCII from the tail.

Re: Unicode in Emacs again

2001-10-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, David Starner wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Oliver Doepner wrote: Emacs-Unicode-990824 -- Internal Character code: 00 Unicode U+ - U+

Re: Unicode in Emacs again

2001-10-28 Thread Kenichi Handa
Eli Zaretskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, David Starner wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Oliver Doepner wrote: Emacs-Unicode-990824 -- Internal Character code: 00

Re: Unicode in Emacs again

2001-10-27 Thread David Starner
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Oliver Doepner wrote: Emacs-Unicode-990824 -- Internal Character code: 00 Unicode U+ - U+ 00 Unicode 20bit (via

Unicode in Emacs again

2001-10-26 Thread Oliver Doepner
Hi, I got personal mail (which was reply to my earlier mail) from eli zaretskii, one of the maintainers of gnu emacs. the team seems to be in need of contributors to improve the unicode support. see below cheers oliver -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:39:50