On Monday 23 April 2007, Sam Revitch wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > xawtv should support V4L2. I'll have to debug it sometimes to find out if
> > the issue lies in the application or in the driver.
>
> Laurent,
>
> It looks like xawtv is passing its argument to
Hi Sam,
On Monday 23 April 2007 08:12, Sam Revitch wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > uvcvideo already implements full buffer management. The streaming I/O
> > V4L2 method is fully supported. I might consider using video-buf later,
> > although there are a
On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xawtv should support V4L2. I'll have to debug it sometimes to find out if the
> issue lies in the application or in the driver.
Laurent,
It looks like xawtv is passing its argument to VIDIOC_DQBUF without
initializing the memory field to V
hi,
--- Sam Revitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > VIDIOCGMBUF is part of the deprecated V4L1 API.
> Applications should be ported
> > to V4L2. Adding V4L1 support is not planned.
> On one side, this is perhaps for the best. It draw
On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VIDIOCGMBUF is part of the deprecated V4L1 API. Applications should be ported
> to V4L2. Adding V4L1 support is not planned.
Hi Laurent,
On one side, this is perhaps for the best. It draws a hard line and
encourages app maintainers to up
Hi Sam,
> > Is there any known reason for that ? That sounds a bit against the UVC
> > spec.
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Good question. I'd guess that Ricoh webcams have non-UVC controls
> because the manufacturer couldn't fit the required functionality into
> the limited code space. Some of
On 4/11/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any known reason for that ? That sounds a bit against the UVC spec.
Laurent,
Thanks for your reply.
Good question. I'd guess that Ricoh webcams have non-UVC controls
because the manufacturer couldn't fit the required functionali
Hi Sam,
> I'm currently working on a V4L driver for Ricoh webcams. I write to
> you because there is some apparent device support overlap that should
> be resolved.
>
> To give a brief description of this type of hardware, all known
> webcams of this sort are built in to laptops, including a hand
Hi Laurent and all,
I'm currently working on a V4L driver for Ricoh webcams. I write to
you because there is some apparent device support overlap that should
be resolved.
To give a brief description of this type of hardware, all known
webcams of this sort are built in to laptops, including a han
