Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] test results and a patch for timestamps in UVC

2011-06-14 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Yann, On Tuesday 14 June 2011 12:02:09 Yann Sionneau wrote: Hi Alexey, Thanks a lot for your testing and report ! :) Your test and mine show that webcams seem to be implementing the UVC spec correctly regarding timestamping. I mean : (*) Putting PTS for each packet (*) Putting

Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] test results and a patch for timestamps in UVC

2011-06-12 Thread Alexey Fisher
Hi, please use uvc_trace(UVC_TRACE_DESCR, or pr_debug instead of printk. So you can enable verbosity only if you need. On Di, 2011-06-07 at 17:56 +0200, Yann Sionneau wrote: Hi again, here is as attached file a new patch that applies to linux 2.6.39 tree (linux-2.6.git, tag v2.6.39).

Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] test results and a patch for timestamps in UVC

2011-06-07 Thread Yann Sionneau
Hi again, here is as attached file a new patch that applies to linux 2.6.39 tree (linux-2.6.git, tag v2.6.39). This patch now prints at the end of each stream : (*) total number of PTS (taking into account each packet) (*) total number of SCR (*) total number of ERR (*) number of packets

Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] test results and a patch for timestamps in UVC

2011-06-06 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Yann, Thanks for the patch. On Friday 03 June 2011 15:48:59 Yann Sionneau wrote: Hi Laurent and the UVC list, Here is a patch (that applies against the linux-2.6.39 vanilla tree) that shows the number of frames whose header (the one described at section 2.4.3.3 of the document USB

Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] test results and a patch for timestamps in UVC

2011-06-06 Thread Yann Sionneau
Le 06/06/11 19:42, Laurent Pinchart a écrit : Hi Yann, Thanks for the patch. On Friday 03 June 2011 15:48:59 Yann Sionneau wrote: Hi Laurent and the UVC list, Here is a patch (that applies against the linux-2.6.39 vanilla tree) that shows the number of frames whose header (the one