We just opened call for proposals. We hope the conference
will be the great venue as previous netdev conferences.
http://netdevconf.org/1.2/submit-proposal.html
Netdev 1.2 is a community-driven conference geared towards
Linux netheads. Linux kernel networking and user space
utilization of the
On 1 June 2016 at 23:13, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> From: Franky Lin
>
> A regression was introduced in commit 9c349892ccc9 ("brcmfmac: revise
> handling events in receive path") which moves eth_type_trans() call
> to brcmf_rx_frame(). Msgbuf layer
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 16:08 -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Coelho, Luciano
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 08:54 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> > > + Luca, Emmanuel
> >
> > Thanks, Bob!
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:11:14 +0200
> For now, I have just three fixes for the current cycle.
>
> One of them, the hwsim one, becomes interesting with some pending
> work to make hwsim work for unprivileged users in namespaces, and
> I don't want
Hi Javier,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Hello Julian,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback and reviews.
>
> On 06/01/2016 12:20 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Coelho, Luciano
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 08:54 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
>> + Luca, Emmanuel
>
> Thanks, Bob!
>
>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:06:57PM -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
>> > Today I compiled 4.6+ and pulled sources
On 31-5-2016 13:46, Grey Christoforo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the following in my dmesg today when I tried out 4.7-rc1 on my
> Dell XPS15 9550. My WiFi doesn't work.
>
> Relevant bits of my lsusb & lspci are:
>
> $ lsusb
> ...
> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0a5c:6410 Broadcom Corp.
> ...
> $ lspci
>
On 1-6-2016 23:13, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> From: Franky Lin
>
> A regression was introduced in commit 9c349892ccc9 ("brcmfmac: revise
> handling events in receive path") which moves eth_type_trans() call
> to brcmf_rx_frame(). Msgbuf layer doesn't use brcmf_rx_frame()
From: Franky Lin
A regression was introduced in commit 9c349892ccc9 ("brcmfmac: revise
handling events in receive path") which moves eth_type_trans() call
to brcmf_rx_frame(). Msgbuf layer doesn't use brcmf_rx_frame() but invokes
brcmf_netif_rx() directly. In such case
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:32:14PM +0300, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2016-05-31 15:35, Seth Forshee wrote:
> >On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:25:08PM +0300, Maya Erez wrote:
> >>Add 60GHz regulatory rules for Korea (KR).
> >>Source is
> >>
>
On 2016-05-31 15:35, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:25:08PM +0300, Maya Erez wrote:
Add 60GHz regulatory rules for Korea (KR).
Source is
http://www.law.go.kr/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99/%EB%AC%B4%EC%84%
A0%EC%84%A4%EB%B9%84%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99
Signed-off-by: Maya Erez
On 01-06-16 16:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> We already support adding extra (AP) interfaces so it also makes an
> obvious sense to allow deleting them.
>
> Adding a new interface is implemented by sending request to firmware for
> creating a new BSS and waiting for a proper event. Ideally deleting
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 12:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> Assuming you mean the "wireless-tools" package, this list is OK. But
> probably nobody will apply the patches, since wireless-tools and the
> WEXT API are long-since deprecated
I don't think anyone even maintains the wireless-tools
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 21:42 +0530, Dibyajyoti Ghosh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to know the mail id list to send a patch on Wireless Tools.
> Kindly reply ASAP.
Assuming you mean the "wireless-tools" package, this list is OK. But
probably nobody will apply the patches, since wireless-tools and the
From: Colin Ian King
path_b_ok is being assigned but immediately after path_a_ok is being
compared to the value 0x03. This appears to be a typo on the
variable name, compare path_b_ok instead.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
Hi,
I want to know the mail id list to send a patch on Wireless Tools.
Kindly reply ASAP.
Thanks,
Dibyajyoti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 12:24 PM, Pan, Miaoqing wrote:
which chip ? And what's the GPIO number ?
lspci -v reports:
09:00.0 Network controller: Qualcomm Atheros AR9462 Wireless Network
Adapter (rev 01)
Subsystem: Foxconn International, Inc. Device e052
Flags: bus master,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:00:40PM +, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:57:52PM +, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> >> Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan writes:
> >>
> >> >> > +void
We already support adding extra (AP) interfaces so it also makes an
obvious sense to allow deleting them.
Adding a new interface is implemented by sending request to firmware for
creating a new BSS and waiting for a proper event. Ideally deleting
interface should be handled in a similar way.
Hello Julian,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and reviews.
On 06/01/2016 12:20 AM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell-sd8xxx.txt DT
>>
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 08:54 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> + Luca, Emmanuel
Thanks, Bob!
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:06:57PM -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> > Today I compiled 4.6+ and pulled sources today
> > iwlwifi isn't super smooth.
>
> I assume you mean wireless-testing, based on
Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:57:52PM +, Valo, Kalle wrote:
>> Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan writes:
>>
>> >> > +void ath10k_sta_update_rx_duration(struct ath10k *ar,
>> >> > +
+ Luca, Emmanuel
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:06:57PM -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> Today I compiled 4.6+ and pulled sources today
> iwlwifi isn't super smooth.
I assume you mean wireless-testing, based on 4.7-rc1 (as this email is
in reply to my announcement of same).
>
> [ 112.345457]
Hi Dave,
For now, I have just three fixes for the current cycle.
One of them, the hwsim one, becomes interesting with some pending
work to make hwsim work for unprivileged users in namespaces, and
I don't want to allow them to crash the system ... I'll thus wait
with that patch until you pull
Hello,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:57:52PM +, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan writes:
>
> >> > +void ath10k_sta_update_rx_duration(struct ath10k *ar,
> >> > + struct ath10k_fw_stats *stats)
> >> > +{
> >> > +
From: "Maxin B. John"
Support separation of SRCDIR and OBJDIR
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John
---
Makefile | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile
which chip ? And what's the GPIO number ?
Thanks,
Miaoqing
From: Sudip Mukherjee
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 3:35 PM
To: Kalle Valo
Cc: Stephen Rothwell; ath9k-devel; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
27 matches
Mail list logo