Re: [Patch] NFC: trf7970a:

2016-12-18 Thread Mark Greer
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 04:19:04PM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote: > Mark, from our consultant: > > It isn't important whether the flood script is successful in writing > or not. The point of it is to force a segfault by making many > requests. It needs to run for several hundred iterations (succe

Re: [PATCH 1/2] brcm: add firmware for the BCM4356 SDIO device

2016-12-18 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Hi Arend, On 18 December 2016 at 21:16, Arend van Spriel wrote: > This patch adds firmware for the BCM4356 2x2 11ac SDIO device. I'm really happy to see Broadcom submitting firmwares again! Is this a good moment to re-request for 4366c0 one?

Re: regression: ath_tx_edma_tasklet() Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section

2016-12-18 Thread Gabriel C
On 18.12.2016 21:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:57:42PM +, Valo, Kalle wrote: Tobias Klausmann writes: A patch for this is already floating on the ML for a while now latest: (ath9k: do not return early to fix rcu unlocking) It's here: https://patchwork.kernel.

Re: regression: ath_tx_edma_tasklet() Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section

2016-12-18 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:57:42PM +, Valo, Kalle wrote: > Tobias Klausmann writes: > > > A patch for this is already floating on the ML for a while now latest: > > (ath9k: do not return early to fix rcu unlocking) > > It's here: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9472709/ Feel free to

Re: wl1251 & mac address & calibration data

2016-12-18 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 18-12-2016 13:09, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 18 December 2016 12:54:00 Arend Van Spriel wrote: >> On 18-12-2016 12:04, Pali Rohár wrote: >>> On Sunday 18 December 2016 11:49:53 Arend Van Spriel wrote: On 16-12-2016 11:40, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 16 December 2016 08:25:44 Daniel

Re: regression: ath_tx_edma_tasklet() Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section

2016-12-18 Thread Tobias Klausmann
On 18.12.2016 20:57, Valo, Kalle wrote: Tobias Klausmann writes: A patch for this is already floating on the ML for a while now latest: (ath9k: do not return early to fix rcu unlocking) It's here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9472709/ Good to know! Hopefully Kalle will include it

Re: regression: ath_tx_edma_tasklet() Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section

2016-12-18 Thread Valo, Kalle
Tobias Klausmann writes: > A patch for this is already floating on the ML for a while now latest: > (ath9k: do not return early to fix rcu unlocking) It's here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9472709/ > Hopefully Kalle will include it in one of his upcoming pull requests. Yes, I'll try to

Re: regression: ath_tx_edma_tasklet() Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section

2016-12-18 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi, A patch for this is already floating on the ML for a while now latest: (ath9k: do not return early to fix rcu unlocking) Hopefully Kalle will include it in one of his upcoming pull requests. Greetings, Tobias On 18.12.2016 16:59, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:52:4

Re: regression: ath_tx_edma_tasklet() Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section

2016-12-18 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:52:48PM +0100, Gabriel C wrote: > Hello, > > while testing kernel 4.9 I run into a weird issue with the ath9k driver. > > I can boot the box in console mode and it stay up sometime but is not usable. Looks to me like someone forgot an rcu_read_unlock() somewhere. Give

regression: ath_tx_edma_tasklet() Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section

2016-12-18 Thread Gabriel C
Hello, while testing kernel 4.9 I run into a weird issue with the ath9k driver. I can boot the box in console mode and it stay up sometime but is not usable. from dmesg : === [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 4.9-fw1 #1 Tainted: G I -

Re: wl1251 & mac address & calibration data

2016-12-18 Thread Pali Rohár
On Sunday 18 December 2016 12:54:00 Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 18-12-2016 12:04, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Sunday 18 December 2016 11:49:53 Arend Van Spriel wrote: > >> On 16-12-2016 11:40, Pali Rohár wrote: > >>> On Friday 16 December 2016 08:25:44 Daniel Wagner wrote: > On 12/16/2016 03:03

Re: wl1251 & mac address & calibration data

2016-12-18 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 18-12-2016 12:04, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 18 December 2016 11:49:53 Arend Van Spriel wrote: >> On 16-12-2016 11:40, Pali Rohár wrote: >>> On Friday 16 December 2016 08:25:44 Daniel Wagner wrote: On 12/16/2016 03:03 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > For the new API a solution for "fal

Re: wl1251 & mac address & calibration data

2016-12-18 Thread Pali Rohár
On Sunday 18 December 2016 11:49:53 Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 16-12-2016 11:40, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Friday 16 December 2016 08:25:44 Daniel Wagner wrote: > >> On 12/16/2016 03:03 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >>> For the new API a solution for "fallback mechanisms" should be > >>> clean th

Re: wl1251 & mac address & calibration data

2016-12-18 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 16-12-2016 11:40, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 16 December 2016 08:25:44 Daniel Wagner wrote: >> On 12/16/2016 03:03 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> For the new API a solution for "fallback mechanisms" should be >>> clean though and I am looking to stay as far as possible from the >>> existing