Re: [6/9] rt2800: fallback from mcs8 to mcs7

2017-01-13 Thread Kalle Valo
Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate > correctly number of retries in TX status code. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka Dropping per Stanislaw's request Patch set to Changes Requested. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9500913/ Do

Re: [PATCH 6/9] rt2800: fallback from mcs8 to mcs7

2017-01-13 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-01-06 14:05, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate > > correctly number of retries in TX status code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka > I think falling back fro

Re: [PATCH 6/9] rt2800: fallback from mcs8 to mcs7

2017-01-12 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2017-01-06 14:05, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate > correctly number of retries in TX status code. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka I think falling back from the lowest dual-stream to the highest single-stream rate is a really bad

[PATCH 6/9] rt2800: fallback from mcs8 to mcs7

2017-01-06 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate correctly number of retries in TX status code. Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka --- drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x0