Re: [PATCH] ath10k: disable wake_tx_queue for older devices

2016-08-04 Thread Dave Taht
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > On 1 August 2016 at 12:04, Dave Taht wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >>> On 7 July 2016 at 19:30, Valo, Kalle

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: disable wake_tx_queue for older devices

2016-08-04 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 1 August 2016 at 12:04, Dave Taht wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: >> On 7 July 2016 at 19:30, Valo, Kalle wrote: >>> Michal Kazior writes: >>> Ideally

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: disable wake_tx_queue for older devices

2016-08-01 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > On 7 July 2016 at 19:30, Valo, Kalle wrote: >> Michal Kazior writes: >> >>> Ideally wake_tx_queue should be used regardless as >>> it is a requirement for reducing

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: disable wake_tx_queue for older devices

2016-07-31 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 7 July 2016 at 19:30, Valo, Kalle wrote: > Michal Kazior writes: > >> Ideally wake_tx_queue should be used regardless as >> it is a requirement for reducing bufferbloat and >> implementing airtime fairness in the future. >> >> However some

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: disable wake_tx_queue for older devices

2016-07-07 Thread Valo, Kalle
Michal Kazior writes: > Ideally wake_tx_queue should be used regardless as > it is a requirement for reducing bufferbloat and > implementing airtime fairness in the future. > > However some setups (typically low-end platforms > hosting QCA988X) suffer performance

[PATCH] ath10k: disable wake_tx_queue for older devices

2016-06-29 Thread Michal Kazior
Ideally wake_tx_queue should be used regardless as it is a requirement for reducing bufferbloat and implementing airtime fairness in the future. However some setups (typically low-end platforms hosting QCA988X) suffer performance regressions with the current wake_tx_queue implementation.