Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: mark expected switch fall-throughs

On 05/25/2018 01:10 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: Yeah, I was wondering the same. Was there a particular reason for this? Sometimes people use this style for a one-line code block. I can change it to the traditional style. No problem. I would prefer that. So if you can send v2 that would be

Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: mark expected switch fall-throughs

On 05/25/2018 08:30 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: Sergei Shtylyov writes: On 5/25/2018 2:13 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R.

Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: mark expected switch fall-throughs

"Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes: > On 05/25/2018 08:30 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Sergei Shtylyov writes: >> >>> On 5/25/2018 2:13 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases

Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: mark expected switch fall-throughs

Sergei Shtylyov writes: > On 5/25/2018 2:13 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases >> where we are expecting to fall through. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva >>

Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: mark expected switch fall-throughs

Hello! On 5/25/2018 2:13 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c | 6 +++--- 1 file

[PATCH] ath6kl: mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git