Hi Johannes,
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 07:49 -0700, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
It's been observed that device sometimes fails to find AP configured
in hidden SSID in busy environment. We will increase number of probes
for specific SSID scans for getting better results.
I question the value of
Hi James,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 07:49:16AM -0700, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
It's been observed that device sometimes fails to find AP configured
in hidden SSID in busy environment. We will increase number of probes
for specific SSID scans for getting better results.
I don't like this.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:01:44AM -0700, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
Hi James,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 07:49:16AM -0700, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
It's been observed that device sometimes fails to find AP configured
in hidden SSID in busy environment. We will increase number of probes
It's been observed that device sometimes fails to find AP
configured in hidden SSID in busy environment. We will increase
number of probes for specific SSID scans for getting better results.
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Avinash Patil pat...@marvell.com
---
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 07:49 -0700, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
It's been observed that device sometimes fails to find AP
configured in hidden SSID in busy environment. We will increase
number of probes for specific SSID scans for getting better results.
I question the value of making the busy
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 07:49:16AM -0700, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
It's been observed that device sometimes fails to find AP
configured in hidden SSID in busy environment. We will increase
number of probes for specific SSID scans for getting better results.
I don't like this. It worries me.
