Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

Hi Sven, i have something like this as of now(generically disabling TX-STBC for streams <= 1 just like ath9k does --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c @@ -4194,6 +4194,9 @@ static struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap ath10k_create_vht_cap(struct ath10k

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:41:48PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 06:54:54PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 June 2016 20:20:02 Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > > [...] > > > [shafi] it would be helpful if you can share your basic

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

Hi Sven, On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 06:54:54PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Tuesday 07 June 2016 20:20:02 Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > [...] > > [shafi] it would be helpful if you can share your basic test results (if its > > possible to share). Have you tried to bring up the card in 5ghz

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

On Tuesday 07 June 2016 20:20:02 Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: [...] > [shafi] it would be helpful if you can share your basic test results (if its > possible to share). Have you tried to bring up the card in 5ghz (or) 2ghz. > Or both of them were tried ? * 5GHz-only (I have no 2.4GHz capable

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

Hi Sven, On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:12:27PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Friday 27 May 2016 12:44:52 Valo, Kalle wrote: > [...] > > > But maybe I should add that the results with the original AP147 firmware > > > also > > > wasn't better. > > > > That doesn't sound good. Maybe a

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

On Friday 27 May 2016 12:44:52 Valo, Kalle wrote: [...] > > But maybe I should add that the results with the original AP147 firmware > > also > > wasn't better. > > That doesn't sound good. Maybe a calibration issue? Maybe but I don't have a different card to compare it to. [...] > I pushed a

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

Sven Eckelmann writes: > On Thursday 26 May 2016 17:32:30 Valo, Kalle wrote: >> Sven Eckelmann writes: >> >> > the QCA9887 chip is similar to the QCA988x chips. But it requires a special >> > firmware and uses a different calibration

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

On Thursday 26 May 2016 17:32:30 Valo, Kalle wrote: > Sven Eckelmann writes: > > > the QCA9887 chip is similar to the QCA988x chips. But it requires a special > > firmware and uses a different calibration data source. Unfortunately, no > > working firmware currently

Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

Sven Eckelmann writes: > the QCA9887 chip is similar to the QCA988x chips. But it requires a special > firmware and uses a different calibration data source. Unfortunately, no > working firmware currently exists. But it is possible to create a semi working > one by

[PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Add support for QCA9887

Hi, the QCA9887 chip is similar to the QCA988x chips. But it requires a special firmware and uses a different calibration data source. Unfortunately, no working firmware currently exists. But it is possible to create a semi working one by binary patching the current version. # download new