Hans de Goede writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 05-11-18 16:05, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arend van Spriel writes:
>>
>>> On 10/9/2018 2:47 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
brcmf_fw_request_next_item and brcmf_fw_request_done both have identical
code to complete the fw-request depending on the item-type.
Hi,
On 05-11-18 16:05, Kalle Valo wrote:
Arend van Spriel writes:
On 10/9/2018 2:47 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
brcmf_fw_request_next_item and brcmf_fw_request_done both have identical
code to complete the fw-request depending on the item-type.
This commit adds a new brcmf_fw_complete_request
Arend van Spriel writes:
> On 10/9/2018 2:47 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> brcmf_fw_request_next_item and brcmf_fw_request_done both have identical
>> code to complete the fw-request depending on the item-type.
>>
>> This commit adds a new brcmf_fw_complete_request helper removing this code
>>
On 10/9/2018 2:47 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
brcmf_fw_request_next_item and brcmf_fw_request_done both have identical
code to complete the fw-request depending on the item-type.
This commit adds a new brcmf_fw_complete_request helper removing this code
duplication.
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel
brcmf_fw_request_next_item and brcmf_fw_request_done both have identical
code to complete the fw-request depending on the item-type.
This commit adds a new brcmf_fw_complete_request helper removing this code
duplication.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
---
