On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 16:22 +0800, Hao Wei Tee wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Hao Wei,
> On 21/8/18 2:36 PM, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > From: Avraham Stern
> >
> > The parameter that indicated whether the LQ command should be sent
> > as sync or async was removed, causing the LQ command to be sent as
> > sync
Hi,
On 21/8/18 2:36 PM, Luca Coelho wrote:
From: Avraham Stern
The parameter that indicated whether the LQ command should be sent
as sync or async was removed, causing the LQ command to be sent as
sync from interrupt context (e.g. from the RX path). This resulted
in a kernel warning:
From: Avraham Stern
The parameter that indicated whether the LQ command should be sent
as sync or async was removed, causing the LQ command to be sent as
sync from interrupt context (e.g. from the RX path). This resulted
in a kernel warning: "scheduling while atomic" and failing to send
the LQ
