On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:18 AM Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
> On 2018-10-06 19:59, Dave Taht wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 10:37 AM Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >>
> >> When there are few packets (e.g. for sampling attempts), the exponentially
> >> weighted variance is usually vastly overestimated,
On 2018-10-06 19:59, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 10:37 AM Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>
>> When there are few packets (e.g. for sampling attempts), the exponentially
>> weighted variance is usually vastly overestimated, making the resulting data
>> essentially useless. As far as I know,
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 10:37 AM Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
> When there are few packets (e.g. for sampling attempts), the exponentially
> weighted variance is usually vastly overestimated, making the resulting data
> essentially useless. As far as I know, there has not been any practical use
> for
When there are few packets (e.g. for sampling attempts), the exponentially
weighted variance is usually vastly overestimated, making the resulting data
essentially useless. As far as I know, there has not been any practical use
for this, so let's not waste any cycles on it.
Signed-off-by: Felix
