On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:54 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
Use the built-in function instead of memset.
Please don't use foo in the title, especially not if the patch only
introduces usage of eth_zero_addr(). It's easier to look for in the
commit log without it.
Other than that, I guess I'll apply
From: Joe Perches j...@perches.com
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:03:17 -0800
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:57 -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100
Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
way
From: Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100
Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and
which don't.
You can't apply this without the dependency patch #1.
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:57 -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100
Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and
which
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:57 -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:16:57 +0100
Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and
which
Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and
which don't.
My guess is the eth_zero_addr and eth_broadcast functions
are always taking aligned(2) arguments, just like all the
is_foo_ether_addr
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 10:00 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 00:52 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
My guess is the eth_zero_addr and eth_broadcast functions
are always taking aligned(2) arguments, just like all the
is_foo_ether_addr functions.
Err, are you
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 02:29 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
Nope, you simply misunderstood what I did write.
What I said was that the arguments were likely
already aligned(2), not that the alignment was
a requirement.
Fair enough. That's not actually true/guaranteed though as far as this
patch
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 09:44 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
Other than that, I guess I'll apply this, but I really wish there was a
way to distinguish more easily which of these require alignment and
which don't.
My guess is the eth_zero_addr and eth_broadcast functions
are always
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 09:16 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:54 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
Use the built-in function instead of memset.
Please don't use foo in the title, especially not if the patch only
introduces usage of eth_zero_addr(). It's easier to look for in the
Use the built-in function instead of memset.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches j...@perches.com
---
net/wireless/ibss.c | 2 +-
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 4 ++--
net/wireless/trace.h| 9 +
net/wireless/wext-sme.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
11 matches
Mail list logo
