Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Increase copy engine entries for rx wmi

2015-03-05 Thread Kalle Valo
Rajkumar Manoharan rmano...@qti.qualcomm.com writes: Having lower number of copy engine entries for target to host WMI ring is causing drops in receiving management frames. This issue is observed during max clients (128 clients) stress testing. While bursting deauthentication frames from

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Increase copy engine entries for rx wmi

2015-02-09 Thread Rajkumar
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 02:54:00PM -0800, Peter Oh wrote: On 02/08/2015 09:46 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: Could you explain why the value of nentries are different? There are separate copy engine configuration tables for host and target. Host-side and Target-side configurations are different

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Increase copy engine entries for rx wmi

2015-02-09 Thread Peter Oh
On 02/08/2015 09:46 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: Having lower number of copy engine entries for target to host WMI ring is causing drops in receiving management frames. This issue is observed during max clients (128 clients) stress testing. While bursting deauthentication frames from simulated

[PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Increase copy engine entries for rx wmi

2015-02-08 Thread Rajkumar Manoharan
Having lower number of copy engine entries for target to host WMI ring is causing drops in receiving management frames. This issue is observed during max clients (128 clients) stress testing. While bursting deauthentication frames from simulated clients, approx. 70% of frames are getting dropped