On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 15:38 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anything new on this front please?
>
> The splat (and therefore deadlock potential) is still there with current
> Linus' tree.
Sorry, haven't had more time to spend on it. I'll do it this evening.
But, just to clarify, the
Hi,
anything new on this front please?
The splat (and therefore deadlock potential) is still there with current
Linus' tree.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > I see the workqueue allocation you mentioned. I'll try to move this
> > allocation out of the mutex and see how it goes.
>
> I have been briefly looking into this as well -- it'll basically have to
> be moved out of the trans_pcie->mutex context, but
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
> Okay, so as I understand it the problem has been there for a long time,
> but the splat is only coming up now because of Thomas' patch that adds
> the lockdep map[1], right?
Yeah, sorry, forgot to mention that pre-49dfe2a67797 kernels wouldn't
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 13:02 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Coelho, Luciano" writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 11:10 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > booting current Linus' tree, I'm seeing lockdep
"Coelho, Luciano" writes:
> On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 11:10 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > booting current Linus' tree, I'm seeing lockdep splat (see the end of this
>> > mail).
>> >
>> > Apparently, there is