Hi Marek,
We have one fix in Rx reorder logic and have handled dev_alloc_skb failure by
resubmitting the urbs.
Could you please test attached experimental patches?
[ 76.769662] usb 1-1: Received between 2 BAR:2918
[ 76.775047] usb 1-1: Networking send size:2914
[ 77.067491] usb 1-1:
Hi Amitkumar,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi Marek,
I tried to capture logs but when enable DYNAMIC_DEBUG I cannot
reproduce issue (running test 30 minutes without allocation
failure).
Thanks for the testing. Yes. Sometimes timing issues
Hi Marek,
I tried to capture logs but when enable DYNAMIC_DEBUG I cannot
reproduce issue (running test 30 minutes without allocation
failure).
Thanks for the testing. Yes. Sometimes timing issues won't get reproduced with
debug messages enabled.
Any update on this? Should I provide some
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:25:01AM +0200, Belisko Marek wrote:
Hi Amitkumar,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi Marek,
I tried both (slightly modified as we're in 3.9 kernel) but
issue is still reproducible. My patch against 3.9 sources:
Dear James Cameron,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:20 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:25:01AM +0200, Belisko Marek wrote:
Hi Amitkumar,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com
wrote:
Hi Marek,
I tried both (slightly
Hi Marek,
That's good :) Actually kernel will take care of freeing skb when
driver submits received packet using netif_rx(). Could you please share
your hack?
Yes it should be freed when netif_rx() is processed but I have feeling
that sometimes (my case) during high load (-b 100m) packets are
Dear Amitkumar Karwar,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi BR,
Dear Amitkumar Karwar,
some additional info.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com
wrote:
Hi BR,
I'm using 3.9 mainline mwifiex driver for
Dear Amitkumar Karwar,
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi Marek,
Sorry for late reply. We have tried to simulate dev_alloc_skb() failure on
our reference platform after 100th, 200th, 300th etc. packets. Our
observation is when the failure
Hi,
I was too fast when hitting Send :)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Belisko Marek marek.beli...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Amitkumar Karwar,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com
wrote:
Hi BR,
Dear Amitkumar Karwar,
some additional info.
On Thu, Sep
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:52:52AM -0700, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
Hi BR,
Dear Amitkumar Karwar,
some additional info.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com
wrote:
Hi BR,
I'm using 3.9 mainline mwifiex driver for wireless usb card. Doing
Hi BR,
I'm using 3.9 mainline mwifiex driver for wireless usb card. Doing some
throughput testing (with iperf) in 5GHz I got following failures:
[ 221.521799] usb 1-1: mwifiex_usb_submit_rx_urb: dev_alloc_skb failed
This is skb allocation failure returned by kernel. 4k buffer is always
Dear Amitkumar Karwar,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Amitkumar Karwar akar...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi BR,
I'm using 3.9 mainline mwifiex driver for wireless usb card. Doing some
throughput testing (with iperf) in 5GHz I got following failures:
[ 221.521799] usb 1-1:
12 matches
Mail list logo
