Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: allow vendor commands to be sent to nan interface

2016-10-21 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 20-10-2016 14:45, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 14:44 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >> >> Sure. On top of this patch or will you deal with those conflicts? >> > > I already applied this, so on top please (i.e. just resend what you > just had, with a commit message?) Yup.

Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: allow vendor commands to be sent to nan interface

2016-10-20 Thread Johannes Berg
> Seeing this patch flying by, my itch became unbearable so I cooked up > the patch below. Please consider this an RFC and let me know your > thoughts. Hah, I had this itch before, but didn't do anything about it yet :) I like it though, care to submit it properly? johannes

Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: allow vendor commands to be sent to nan interface

2016-10-20 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 19-10-2016 6:47, Luca Coelho wrote: > From: Andrei Otcheretianski > > Allow vendor commands that require WIPHY_VENDOR_CMD_NEED_RUNNING flag, to > be sent to NAN interface. > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski >