On 20-10-2016 14:45, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 14:44 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>
>> Sure. On top of this patch or will you deal with those conflicts?
>>
>
> I already applied this, so on top please (i.e. just resend what you
> just had, with a commit message?)
Yup.
> Seeing this patch flying by, my itch became unbearable so I cooked up
> the patch below. Please consider this an RFC and let me know your
> thoughts.
Hah, I had this itch before, but didn't do anything about it yet :)
I like it though, care to submit it properly?
johannes
On 19-10-2016 6:47, Luca Coelho wrote:
> From: Andrei Otcheretianski
>
> Allow vendor commands that require WIPHY_VENDOR_CMD_NEED_RUNNING flag, to
> be sent to NAN interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski
>