Erik Stromdahl writes:
> Ok, I'll do another round of checkpatch before I submit anything.
> I couldn't find the script you mentioned though (ath10k-check).
Did you check the link I gave you:
On 2017-02-19 15:05, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Erik Stromdahl writes:
I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar
functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been
integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to
Ok, I'll do another round of checkpatch before I submit anything.
I couldn't find the script you mentioned though (ath10k-check).
Is it some kind of checkpatch wrapper?
Anyway, I have a few warnings related to 'line over 80 chars' that
is really hard to get rid of (without breaking indentation
Erik Stromdahl writes:
> I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar
> functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been
> integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to master-pending.
>
> Below are the
Hej,
I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar
functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been
integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to master-pending.
Below are the commits I am talking about
Kalle Valo writes:
> Erik Stromdahl writes:
>
>> I was actually about to email you about this.
>>
>> I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be
>> best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code
Hej,
I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar
functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been
integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to master-pending.
Below are the commits I am talking about
Erik Stromdahl writes:
> I was actually about to email you about this.
>
> I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be
> best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code (v4).
>
> Then you can tweak it (v5).
>
> It is only
Hej Kalle,
I was actually about to email you about this.
I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be
best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code (v4).
Then you can tweak it (v5).
It is only minor updates to the HIF layer (added QCA9377 support)
Hej,
Erik Stromdahl writes:
> This is the third version of the sdio RFC patch series.
> The actual sdio code (patch 6) has been subject to a massive overhaul,
> mainly as a result of Kalle's review comments.
> It no longer has any strong resemblance of the original
Erik Stromdahl writes:
> This is the third version of the sdio RFC patch series.
> The actual sdio code (patch 6) has been subject to a massive overhaul,
> mainly as a result of Kalle's review comments.
> It no longer has any strong resemblance of the original ath6kl
11 matches
Mail list logo