Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-19 Thread Valo, Kalle
Erik Stromdahl writes: > Ok, I'll do another round of checkpatch before I submit anything. > I couldn't find the script you mentioned though (ath10k-check). Did you check the link I gave you:

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-19 Thread Erik Stromdahl
On 2017-02-19 15:05, Valo, Kalle wrote: Erik Stromdahl writes: I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-19 Thread Erik Stromdahl
Ok, I'll do another round of checkpatch before I submit anything. I couldn't find the script you mentioned though (ath10k-check). Is it some kind of checkpatch wrapper? Anyway, I have a few warnings related to 'line over 80 chars' that is really hard to get rid of (without breaking indentation

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-19 Thread Valo, Kalle
Erik Stromdahl writes: > I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar > functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been > integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to master-pending. > > Below are the

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-19 Thread Erik Stromdahl
Hej, I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to master-pending. Below are the commits I am talking about

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-19 Thread Valo, Kalle
Kalle Valo writes: > Erik Stromdahl writes: > >> I was actually about to email you about this. >> >> I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be >> best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-19 Thread Erik Stromdahl
Hej, I just noticed that Ryan Hsu submitted two patches containing similar functionality to what I have in my tree on github. They have not been integrated in the ath master yet, but they have been added to master-pending. Below are the commits I am talking about

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-18 Thread Valo, Kalle
Erik Stromdahl writes: > I was actually about to email you about this. > > I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be > best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code (v4). > > Then you can tweak it (v5). > > It is only

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-18 Thread Erik Stromdahl
Hej Kalle, I was actually about to email you about this. I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code (v4). Then you can tweak it (v5). It is only minor updates to the HIF layer (added QCA9377 support)

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-02-18 Thread Valo, Kalle
Hej, Erik Stromdahl writes: > This is the third version of the sdio RFC patch series. > The actual sdio code (patch 6) has been subject to a massive overhaul, > mainly as a result of Kalle's review comments. > It no longer has any strong resemblance of the original

Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support

2017-01-23 Thread Valo, Kalle
Erik Stromdahl writes: > This is the third version of the sdio RFC patch series. > The actual sdio code (patch 6) has been subject to a massive overhaul, > mainly as a result of Kalle's review comments. > It no longer has any strong resemblance of the original ath6kl