Hi,
Im using linux 4.6 kernel, I get following error when I do interface up.
Here is the boot log.
[4.407681] iwlwifi :01:00.0: loaded firmware version 16.242414.0
op_mode iwlmvm
[4.407742] iwlwifi :01:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Wireless N 7260,
REV=0x144
[4.407831] iwlwifi
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192x: Enabling and disabling hardware
> interrupts
> after enabling local irq flags
>
> On 01/20/2017 08:14 AM, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > On 01/19/2017 04:14 AM, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> >>> -Realtek 8192CE chi
> On 01/19/2017 04:14 AM, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > -Realtek 8192CE chipset maintains local irq flags after enabling/disabling
> > hardware interrupts.
> > -Hardware interrupts are enabled before enabling the local irq
> > flags(these flags are being c
the sequence of setting these irq flags.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bhara...@xilinx.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
b/drivers/net/wi
at that statement, without reaching back enable_irq, looks like by
this time CPU is in stall.
Can any tell why hardware interrupts are being enabled before kernel changing
IRQ line state?
Regards,
Bharat
>
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 02:40:48PM +, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> >
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 02:40:48PM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After taking some more lecroy traces, we see that after 2nd ASSERT from EP
> on ARM64 we see continuous data movement of 32 dwords or 12 dwords and
> never sign of DEASSERT.
> >
RM64, i'm not sure if i should answer
> here
> or not, but i have similar "stalls" with ath9k on x86_64 (starting with
> 4.9rc), stack
> trace is posted down below where the original ARM64 stall traces are.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Tobias
>
>
> On 08.12.2
original ARM64 stall traces are.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Tobias
>
>
> On 08.12.2016 18:36, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gog...@xilinx.com> writes:
> >
> >> > [+cc Kalle, ath9k list]
> > Thanks, but please also CC linux-wireles
> >
> > Thanks, but please also CC linux-wireless. Full thread below for the folks
> > there.
> >
> > >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:49:42PM +, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Did anyone
t;
> >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:49:42PM +, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Did anyone test Atheros ATH9
> >> > driver(drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/)
> >> > on ARM64. The end point is TP link
10 matches
Mail list logo