Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> If we go with approach to use parameters and let FW or MAC80211 >> layer to decide what type of scan to do, > > At that point though, is it even meaningful to ask "what type of scan > is this"? Or put another way

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 12:45 -0800, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> >> We can either use alternative structure in kernel wireless stack, >> or alternative structure in userspace (in wpa_suppl

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> Supporting requests (or more precisely requests and results) >> differentiated by user-space entity can be tricky. Right now we are >> not checking current caller pid, right? Maybe it is also good idea - >> or

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote: > On 7-12-2016 19:39, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Johannes Berg >> <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Indeed, results are

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> Indeed, results are results. I just want to take care of two things: >> 1) Memory consumption - we can clear stale scan results for >> connection, but not for location if we are using history scan. > > Well

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

Hi Johannes, On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > Sorry I didn't respond earlier. > >>Currently we have sched scan with possibility of various >> intervals. We would like to extend it to support also >> different types of scan. > >

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote: > On 22-11-2016 21:54, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Arend Van Spriel >> <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote: >>> On 22-11-2016 18:2

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote: > On 22-11-2016 18:29, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> Hi Luca, >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Luca Coelho <l...@coelho.fi> wrote: >>> Hi Dmitry, >>> On W

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

Hi Luca, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Luca Coelho <l...@coelho.fi> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 22:47 +, dimitr...@google.com wrote: >> From 68a9d37a4c7e9dc7a90a6e922cdea52737a98d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitr...@g

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspr...@broadcom.com> wrote: > On 16-11-2016 23:47, dimitr...@google.com wrote: >> From 68a9d37a4c7e9dc7a90a6e922cdea52737a98d66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitr...@google.com> >>

[PATCH] nl80211: report age of bss entry from boot in microseconds

User-space needs to know real time from boot (including suspend) of bss entry for location and connectivity services. Change-Id: I7d5db4378d7941ccecf8ac675425024c2aafe62b Signed-off-by: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitr...@google.com> --- include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h | 2 ++ net/wireless/