Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

It seems you are already pissed off, but could you please reply inline instead of top posting. Its a drag to scroll up and down. On 4/12/2018 7:05 PM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: Hi. I thought I made myself clear. I leave in France. My system(s) is/are set up to use FR as default regulatory

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On 4/12/2018 5:52 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 08:18 -0700, Steve deRosier wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote: On 4/12/2018 10:42 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: Hi. This is beyond my comprehension that you could assert

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:25 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > It's the second time that you (Ben and Steve) are implying that I > might break the law. > No implication intended. All I said is regulatory operation is constrained by laws in various jurisdictions. And how

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On 04/12/2018 10:25 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: It's the second time that you (Ben and Steve) are implying that I might break the law. But why are you saying that ? I am not gonna repeat myself again. If you force the NIC to use a different regulatory domain that what it originally was tested

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

It's the second time that you (Ben and Steve) are implying that I might break the law. But why are you saying that ? I am not gonna repeat myself again. And for the patch, it is also implied that I am able to write one. 2018-04-12 19:11 GMT+02:00 Ben Greear : > On

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On 04/12/2018 10:05 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: Hi. I thought I made myself clear. I leave in France. My system(s) is/are set up to use FR as default regulatory domain. But when I plug in that tp-link card, I am restricted to use CN regulatory domain. Why am I the only one to see this as a

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

Hi. I thought I made myself clear. I leave in France. My system(s) is/are set up to use FR as default regulatory domain. But when I plug in that tp-link card, I am restricted to use CN regulatory domain. Why am I the only one to see this as a problem ? I know that one can only have one regdom

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 08:18 -0700, Steve deRosier wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Arend van Spriel > wrote: > > On 4/12/2018 10:42 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > This is beyond my comprehension that you could assert this is a > >

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:51 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 4/12/2018 10:42 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> This is beyond my comprehension that you could assert this is a non issue. > > > Well. I am just saying that it is by design. There is no way for

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On 4/12/2018 10:42 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: Hi. This is beyond my comprehension that you could assert this is a non issue. Well. I am just saying that it is by design. There is no way for the regulatory code to determine where you and your hardware actually reside so instead it takes a

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

On 4/12/2018 9:00 AM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: Nobody cares about this ? Should I report this as a bug to the LKML ? or elsewhere ? to ath9k_htc dev ? to crda dev ? Please. Hi, I do not think nobody cares, but what you describe is actually no issue as far as I can determine. Wifi cards are

Re: second wifi card enforce CN reg dom

Nobody cares about this ? Should I report this as a bug to the LKML ? or elsewhere ? to ath9k_htc dev ? to crda dev ? Please. 2018-04-10 21:57 GMT+02:00 solsTiCe d'Hiver : > hi. > > I am trying to capture on 2 channels at the same time with 2 cards. > > One card is