On 20 July 2016 at 13:43, Shajakhan, Mohammed Shafi (Mohammed Shafi)
wrote:
> Michal,
>
> Can you please let me know if this change is fine or not ?
> I am waiting infinitely for your reply long time
Sorry. I was absent for a while and this email slipped by.
Quoting
Hi Michal / Kalle / Ben,
is this patch is good to go (or) should i re-work ?
I had replied to Michal's comment of introducing a new firmware
feature flag will not address the issue in older firmware / code.
Let me know if i had missed something very obvious.
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:21:01AM
On 06/30/2016 03:25 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Ben Greear writes:
Is there a better way than posting to the ath10k mailing list? There are quite
a few more of my patches that are stuck in pending or ignored state. If you
could review some of them and add them to your
Ben Greear writes:
> Is there a better way than posting to the ath10k mailing list? There are
> quite
> a few more of my patches that are stuck in pending or ignored state. If you
> could review some of them and add them to your testing trees then it might
> help
>
Hello Michal/ Kalle,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:48:38AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 27 June 2016 at 16:36, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
> wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > thanks for the review ..
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
> >>
On 27 June 2016 at 16:36, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> thanks for the review ..
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
>> On 23 June 2016 at 18:40, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
>> wrote:
>> > From:
Hi Michal,
thanks for the review ..
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 23 June 2016 at 18:40, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
> wrote:
> > From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
> >
> > For chipsets like QCA99X0, IPQ4019
On 23 June 2016 at 18:40, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
wrote:
> From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
>
> For chipsets like QCA99X0, IPQ4019 and later we are not getting proper
> NULL func status (always acked/successs !!) when hostapd does a
>
On 06/25/2016 11:53 AM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
Hello Ben,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:12:01AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 06/23/2016 09:40 AM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
For chipsets like QCA99X0, IPQ4019 and later we
Hello Ben,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:12:01AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 09:40 AM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
> >From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
> >
> >For chipsets like QCA99X0, IPQ4019 and later we are not getting proper
> >NULL func status (always
On 06/23/2016 09:40 AM, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
For chipsets like QCA99X0, IPQ4019 and later we are not getting proper
NULL func status (always acked/successs !!) when hostapd does a
PROBE_CLIENT via nullfunc frames when the
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
For chipsets like QCA99X0, IPQ4019 and later we are not getting proper
NULL func status (always acked/successs !!) when hostapd does a
PROBE_CLIENT via nullfunc frames when the station is powered off
abruptly (inactive timer probes client
12 matches
Mail list logo