Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-10-05 Thread Kalle Valo
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > Kalle Valo writes: > >> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: >> >>> Kalle Valo writes: >>> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: I understand your point, but I don't want

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-10-05 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Kalle Valo writes: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > >> Kalle Valo writes: >> >>> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: >>> >>> I understand your point, but I don't want to rush this to 4.9 and then >>> start getting lots of

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-10-05 Thread Kalle Valo
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > Kalle Valo writes: > >> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: >> >> I understand your point, but I don't want to rush this to 4.9 and then >> start getting lots of bug reports and eventually forced to revert it. If >>

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-10-05 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Kalle Valo writes: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > > This is great work but due to the regressions I'm not sure if this > will be ready for 4.9. To get more testing time I wonder if we should > wait for 4.10? IMHO applying this in the end of

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-08-23 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 23-08-16 08:59, Kalle Valo wrote: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > > This is great work but due to the regressions I'm not sure if this > will be ready for 4.9. To get more testing time I wonder if we should > wait for 4.10? IMHO applying this in the end of the

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-08-23 Thread Kalle Valo
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: This is great work but due to the regressions I'm not sure if this will be ready for 4.9. To get more testing time I wonder if we should wait for 4.10? IMHO applying this in the end of the cycle is too risky and we should try to

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-08-22 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Kalle Valo writes: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > >> Kalle Valo writes: >> >>> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: >>> This switches ath9k over to using the mac80211 intermediate software queueing mechanism for

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-08-22 Thread Kalle Valo
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > Kalle Valo writes: > >> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: >> >>> This switches ath9k over to using the mac80211 intermediate software >>> queueing mechanism for data packets. It removes the queueing inside the >>>

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-08-22 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Kalle Valo writes: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > >> This switches ath9k over to using the mac80211 intermediate software >> queueing mechanism for data packets. It removes the queueing inside the >> driver, except for the retry queue, and instead pulls

Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-08-22 Thread Kalle Valo
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes: > This switches ath9k over to using the mac80211 intermediate software > queueing mechanism for data packets. It removes the queueing inside the > driver, except for the retry queue, and instead pulls from mac80211 when > a packet is needed. The retry

[PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.

2016-08-05 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
This switches ath9k over to using the mac80211 intermediate software queueing mechanism for data packets. It removes the queueing inside the driver, except for the retry queue, and instead pulls from mac80211 when a packet is needed. The retry queue is used to store a packet that was pulled but