On 2015-02-10 11:34, Yuwei Zheng wrote:
The ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb function excute on the interrupt context, and
ath9k_rx_tasklet excute
on the soft irq context. In other words, the ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb have more
chance to excute than
ath9k_rx_tasklet. So in the worst condition, the rx.rxbuf
Do every one OK with this patch? I think this one is the last version?
Am 10.02.2015 um 01:34 schrieb Yuwei Zheng:
The ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb function excute on the interrupt context, and
ath9k_rx_tasklet excute
on the soft irq context. In other words, the ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb have more
chance
The ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb function excute on the interrupt context, and
ath9k_rx_tasklet excute
on the soft irq context. In other words, the ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb have more
chance to excute than
ath9k_rx_tasklet. So in the worst condition, the rx.rxbuf receive list is
always full,
and the do
