On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 12:50 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
>> This may already be apparent, but Dell sells two versions of the 9350:
>> one with the Broadcom adapter and one with the AC 8260.
>
> Off
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Chris Rorvick <ch...@rorvick.com> wrote:
> I didn't receive your email so I'll try to respond via Paul's.
>>> If this is really bothering you, I guess I could apply this patch for
>>> now. But as I said, this is not solving the actual
Hi Luca,
I didn't receive your email so I'll try to respond via Paul's.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> This is not coming from the NIC itself, but from the platform's ACPI
>> tables. Can you tell us which platform you are using?
Interesting. I'm
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> For what it's worth, on my machine I have twenty (!) SPLX entries, all
> reading:
> Name (SPLX, Package (0x04)
> {
> Zero,
> Package (0x03)
> {
> 0x8000,
>
Hi Luca,
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
Tested-by: Chris Rorvick <ch...@rorvick.com>
I think the debug output looks as expe
Hi Luca,
FYI, It seems that Google does not like your email as I'm not
receiving any of your messages in gmail. Some responses below:
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 15:24 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:09 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 201