Re: ath9k driver may be broken on ARM64 ?

2018-10-24 Thread Ellie Revves
useful is yet initialized... Thanks Ellie Revves a écrit : Hi, sure, I enabled atheros wireless debugging in my kernel and am rebuilding it. After this is done, should I set ath9k.debug= on the cmdline ? It is built as module, but my filesystem is read-only so no modprobe.d snippet can

Re: ath9k driver may be broken on ARM64 ?

2018-10-24 Thread Ellie Revves
Hi, sure, I enabled atheros wireless debugging in my kernel and am rebuilding it. After this is done, should I set ath9k.debug= on the cmdline ? It is built as module, but my filesystem is read-only so no modprobe.d snippet can be added. Thanks Tom Psyborg a écrit : Hi There was similar

Re: ath9k driver may be broken on ARM64 ?

2018-10-24 Thread Ellie Revves
Here's another boot log along with some commands after the system booted up to show what I did. I don't think I did anything wrong, and yet this is no different, debug option appears to be completely useless. http://ix.io/1pY0 Thanks Tom Psyborg a écrit : if your system is read-only then you

Re: ath9k driver may be broken on ARM64 ?

2018-10-24 Thread Ellie Revves
Hi, CONFIG_ATH9K_PCOEM is already enabled in my kernel build. In fact if it is disabled my card does not show up at all. Thanks Tom Psyborg a écrit : Hi Try selecting config option ATH9K_SUPPORT_PCOEM (Support chips used in PC OEM cards) and rebuild your image. I'm not familiar with your

ath9k driver may be broken on ARM64 ?

2018-10-23 Thread Ellie Revves
Hi, for the context part: I've got a marvell espressobin board, to which I attached a mini-PCIE wireless card, atheros AR9565 aka. QCB335. I am using both archlinux-arm and a custom OS made with buildroot, and both have this problem. Problem: When the system boots up, the kernel recognizes