/30/578 I proposed a patch that emits a
warning in cases like this.)
Did you perhaps meant to select WANT_DEV_COREDUMP? Or is the Kconfig
symbol BACKPORT_WANT_DEV_COREDUMP queued somewhere?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 09:45 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 09:40 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
Your commit aadede6e9f4c (iwlwifi: mvm: port to devcoredump framework)
landed in today's linux-next (next-20141031). It adds a select statement
for BACKPORT_WANT_DEV_COREDUMP
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:08 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:06 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
Perhaps you could also look into somehow guarding the call of
dev_coredumpm(), that this commit added, with checks for
CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP. See, I had a quick look at all
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 08:52 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl writes:
Commit 24a0aa212ee2 (cfg80211: make WEXT compatibility unselectable)
made it impossible to depend on CFG80211_WEXT. It does still allow to
select that symbol. (Yes, the commit summary is confusing
mention anything like that, so probably I'm
just confused.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This reverts commit 60220f41775e634258efd1b54c6fa81ce706.
The raison d'être of commit 60220f41 (ipw2200: select
CFG80211_WEXT) was reverted in commit 2d36e008739e (Revert cfg80211:
make WEXT compatibility unselectable). So revert this commit too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 11:14 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 01/03/15 23:28, Paul Bolle wrote:
Side note: am I correct in thinking that there's some successor to
CFG80211_WEXT and that the ipw2200 driver could, at least in theory, be
ported to that successor? (ipw2200 hardware appears
of
what's provided under WIRELESS_EXT). Did I get that right?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
+ */
This states the license is GPL v2.
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPL);
So you probably want
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL v2);
here.
Paul Bolle
details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
+ */
This states the license is GPL v2.
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPL);
So you probably want
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL v2);
here.
Paul Bolle
..c9ec7869dbd2 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/Makefile
@@ -7,5 +7,3 @@ nxp-nci_i2c-objs = i2c.o
obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_NXP_NCI) += nxp-nci.o
obj-$(CONFIG_NFC_NXP_NCI_I2C) += nxp-nci_i2c.o
-
-ccflags-$(CONFIG_NFC_DEBUG) := -DDEBUG
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe
work: a select of a Kconfig symbol will trigger the select
statements of that Kconfig symbol.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
. And, according to include/linux/module.h, that
ident states the license is GPL v2 or later. So I think either the
comments or the idents need to change.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-wireless in
the body of a message to majord
ents[0].integer.value != 0) {
> > - IWL_ERR(trans, "Unsupported splx structure\n");
> > + IWL_WARN(trans, "Unsupported splx structure, not limiting WiFi
> > power\n");
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> If this is really bothering you, I guess I could apply this patch for
> now. But as I said, this is not solving the actual problem.
Bikeshedding: I think IWL_INFO() is more appropriate, as info doesn't
imply one needs to act on this message, while warn does imply that
action is needed.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
01 is increased until
it reaches RP20. (The machine has 20 PCI devices according to lspci. I
have no clue how to match that RPxx number to the 20 devices showing up
in lspci, sorry.)
Paul Bolle
nt:
Detected Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless AC 8260, REV=0x208
> In any case, I will rework this code, so I'd prefer if we skip this
> patch entirely.
Feel free to prod me for testing whatever you come up with.
Paul Bolle
Luca,
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
Tested-by: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>
Not that this test was worth a lot: it builds cle
100 lines or so, that
apparently are generated directly after modprobing iwlwifi.
After these 100 lines there's a ten second gap (I guess it took me ten
seconds to actually use the wifi). I assume you don't care about that
part of the debug messages.
Have fun!
Paul Bolle
<7>[ 767.691342]
benefits for the users
of these laptops? In other words: should I bother somehow contacting
Dell and point them to this discussion in order to have them fix this?
Paul Bolle
Chris' version came preinstalled with
something else?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
net/wireless/reg.o' failed
make: *** [net/wireless/reg.o] Error 2
Didn't Thomas Gleixner suggest that you do a basic C course just yesterday?
Paul Bolle
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 01:50 +0300, Ozgur Karatas wrote:
> I don't have a problem with C programming
I'm sorry, but you do need to learn C, at a basic level, first.
Paul Bolle
22 matches
Mail list logo
