On 07/08/17 12:26, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 7/26/2017 10:25 PM, Ian Molton wrote:
>> Unlikely to be a problem, but brcmf_sdiod_regrb() is
>> not symmetric with brcmf_sdiod_regrl() in this regard.
>
> You are pretty keen on symmetry, but you could also remove the
> initialization in
On 7/26/2017 10:25 PM, Ian Molton wrote:
Unlikely to be a problem, but brcmf_sdiod_regrb() is
not symmetric with brcmf_sdiod_regrl() in this regard.
You are pretty keen on symmetry, but you could also remove the
initialization in brcmf_sdiod_regrl(). As long as no -Wunitialized pops
