Re: [PATCH FIX] brcmfmac: fix reporting support for 160 MHz channels

Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > Driver can report IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ so it's > important to provide valid & complete info about supported bands for > each channel. By default no support for 160 MHz should be assumed unless > firmware reports it for a given

Re: [PATCH FIX] brcmfmac: fix reporting support for 160 MHz channels

Rafał Miłecki writes: > On 2018-11-09 15:05, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Rafał Miłecki writes: >> >>> From: Rafał Miłecki >>> >>> Driver can report IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ so it's >>> important to provide valid & complete info about supported bands for >>> each channel. By default no

Re: [PATCH FIX] brcmfmac: fix reporting support for 160 MHz channels

On 2018-11-09 15:05, Kalle Valo wrote: Rafał Miłecki writes: From: Rafał Miłecki Driver can report IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ so it's important to provide valid & complete info about supported bands for each channel. By default no support for 160 MHz should be assumed unless

Re: [PATCH FIX] brcmfmac: fix reporting support for 160 MHz channels

Rafał Miłecki writes: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > Driver can report IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ so it's > important to provide valid & complete info about supported bands for > each channel. By default no support for 160 MHz should be assumed unless > firmware reports it for a given